This article was commissioned and first appeared on The Wire.in

The British monarchy is not in a state of collapse, even though it is an expensive dynastic anachronism and an outdated symbol of privilege. But the unprecedented arrest for nearly 12 hours at 8am on February 19 of the former Prince Andrew (also Duke of York) is Britain’s most serious constitutional upset for generations. 

The arrest is a warning to his elder brother, King Charles, and the whole “Royal Family” that, while antics by the King’s son Prince Harry (now living in Los Angeles with his American actor wife) might shock and even amuse, and while the King’s early adulterous life-style was tolerated and eventually forgiven, Andrew’s arrest for alleged “misconduct in public office” tied to the Jeffery Epstein sex scandals is a step too far.

This photo of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor being driven home
from Aylsham police station in Norfolk on Feb 19th evening has
been published worldwide photo by Phil Noble (Reuters) who
had a tipoff Aylsham was where the former prince would be held

The family clearly realises this and did its best to maintain its image as a secure and reliable national institution that was still at work, performing public duties, after the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, as he is now known having been stripped of his titles and privileges three months ago. 

The King was met with applause when he attended, as planned, the opening of London Fashion Week (see below). His wife Queen Camilla met an internationally famous fashion editor and attended a concert in Westminster. Princess Anne, the hardest working “Royal” and Andrew and the King’s sister, ironically visited a prison in Leeds.

Andrew is no longer in a police cell, having been taken home on the 19th evening after spending his 66th birthday in custody at Aylsham police station an hour’s drive away. By then, detectives had finished searching the farmhouse on the family’s Sandringham estate in Norfolk where the King shifted him three months ago to remove him from public view. Andrew is known for his pomp and bluster, and it looks as though the police needed to secure him while the Sandringham search took place.

They also searched Royal Lodge, his previous grand home on the royal Windsor estate west of London. He remains formally “under investigation”, and the police are continuing with the search at Windsor where he lived from 2004.

The arrest was on suspicion of misconduct in public office (which he denies) for passing official and secret papers on British investment and other subjects to his friend Epstein while he was an official Special Representative for International Trade and Investment, a post he held between 2001 and 2011. He lost that jet-setting role because he continued the friendship after Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender in 2008. He was then confined to the UK where, it was announced, he would “continue to support business in the UK” and would not have a specialised role. 

Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park, Andrew’s 30-room home from 2004-2024

Illustrating the range of activities outside his brief, he liaised with Epstein during “private days” at the start of an official visit to China on an $8bn cash-for-oil swap between a Chinese sovereign wealth fund and the rulers of the United Arab Emirates while the disgraced financier was under house arrest for soliciting sex from an underage girl.

Andrew was dubbed Randy Andy in his youth, as The Times reported yesterday: “HRH Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, born at Buckingham Palace, had a reputation by the time he could walk. As a toddler he would kick the dogs and taunt the staff. As a five-year-old he was thrown in a dung heap by grooms at the Royal Mews in Windsor, sick of him taunting the horses with a stick. As a teenager he acquired the nickname Randy Andy, and as a young man his behaviour was so atrocious that a footman punched him in the face”.

But he was the late Queen Elizabeth’s favourite son and was protected till she died in September 2022 by her continued forgiveness and financial support. That support was perhaps the only major blunder in her much admired long reign. She is widely believed to have helped finance a $12m settlement paid to Virginia Giuffre who sued him, claiming he sexually assaulted her on three occasions when she was 17 and being trafficked by Epstein, allegations Andrew has repeatedly denied.  

Since then, stories of his involvement with Epstein have increased.  They escalated after President Trump authorised the US Department of Justice to release millions of files and images. That led to growing public pressure in the UK for Andrew to lose his royal status and also led to a formal demand for him to give evidence to the US Congress.

He previously resisted informal calls to appear before Congress. Now his arrest and continued police inquiries will ironically protect him, at least for some time, from the extreme embarrassment of a hostile Congress inquisition. Meanwhile there are calls for him to be removed soon from his position as eighth in the line of succession to the British throne.

It had been assumed that he would eventually be formally accused of sexual offences, maybe the rape alleged by Giuffre or for other paedophilia. But the revelations that he had handed over secret government information to Epstein quickly led to police inquiries and yesterday’s arrest and alleged “misconduct in public office”.

Legal experts say this common law offence is generally used only on misconduct by public servants when other offences, for example fraud, are not suitable. It can also often be very difficult to prove. Between 2014 and 2024, 92 per cent of those convicted of the offence were in the police forces or prison service. There have been no convictions of high-profile individuals for the offence in modern times. 

The King fulfilling a planned public engagement at the opening of London Fashion Week while his brother was in custody – photo credit: Richard Pohle/AFP via Getty Images

Till now, the royal family have only had minor skirmished with the law.  Princess Anne’s dog, a bull terrier, bit two girls in Windsor Great Park in 2002 after which she was fined £500. She was also fined £400 in 2001 for driving her Bentley at 93 mph in a 70-mph zone in Gloucestershire. 

Sir Keir Starmer, the UK prime minister, has said that “nobody is above the law” and the King has agreed to support police inquires. Saying yesterday that a “full, fair and proper process” must now take place, he added: “In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation. Let me state clearly: the law must take its course.”

Separately, Andrew might become linked with police inquiries into the use of Stansted airport, 30 miles from London, by private flights trafficking under-age girls that have emerged from the Epstein files. Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called for the police “urgently” to re-examine whether Epstein’s victims were trafficked within and outside of the UK.

These events have already led to demands by anti-royalists in the social media and elsewhere for the monarchy to be abolished, despite basic popular support.

A survey in January showed that views on the royal family had not changed much during the Epstein revelations. Britons were twice as likely to have a positive opinion of the King than a negative one (60% vs 31%). He has been admired for the way he has continued his role while being treated for cancer that was diagnosed two years ago.

Many anti-royalists argue that removing the royal family would begin to give Britain the social change that it needs. There can be no doubt that Britain’s multi-tiered hierarchical class system, with the Royal Family perched somewhat precariously at the peak, needs reform. Visitors from abroad can scarcely believe the complex social strata. 

The family is however almost certainly secure, providing it adapts as the Andrew saga unfolds, accepts considerably more disclosure and public accountability for its immense wealth and avoids Andrew-type excesses and scandals. 

It is also protected by the absence of any popular alternative system for head of state. At a time when respect for politicians is at what must be an all-time low, there is little appetite for changing benign King Charles, and even his heir Prince William, with someone from the political class. 

I

Posted by: John Elliott | February 15, 2026

Ai Weiwei and Tyeb Mehta star in Delhi’s art fair week

First retrospective of India’s leading “Progressive” modernist

Ai Weiwei balances criticism of China with views on India and the West

There were two stars during Delhi’s India Art Fair week earlier this month. One was Ai Weiwei, the leading Chinese dissident artist who was on his first major visit to the country.

Ai Weiwei in Delhi© John Elliott

The other was Tyeb Mehta, possibly the most distinguished of India’s famous “modern” artists whose 100th birth anniversaries have been celebrated with major exhibitions in recent months.

Both Ai and Tyeb (as he is colloquially known) have tackled the issues and problems of their times. Ai, age 68, continues to attack China’s repression, state power and censorship, though he balanced this with criticisms of India and the West.

Tyeb, who died in 2009 age 83, sought with his peers to develop new artistic styles after India’s independence and reflect on traumas such as the 1947 partition of India creating Pakistan. 

Ai was among the early visitors to the fair on the preview day when he stopped at the Nature Morte stand where one of his Iron Root cast iron sculptures was on view at EUR 300,000 and was later sold. 

Ai Weiwei’s “Iron Root” cast iron sculpture on the Nature Morte stand

I caught him for a few words as he arrived. I’ve always wondered how such a hounded artist keeps going, so asked him whether he had ever thought of giving up.

“I haven’t started yet and I’m quite confused because there is so much that is attractive but also not,” he said, fingering a loose button on my shirt collar. The button came off in his hand and he gave it to me saying “When I was young and a button came off, I kept it because I was so poor, though now I am no longer poor”.

Speaking during a series of events and interviews, he seemed to be taking care to balance his remarks on China with criticisms of India and the West. He visited China last December (2025) for the first time in 15 years to see his 93-year-old mother. He stayed three weeks without problems and left freely. Earlier he had been imprisoned (2011), had his passport confiscated and been harassed by police.

Tyeb Mehta, Falling Figure with bird, 2004
Tyeb’s “Falling Figure with Bird” (2004), image courtesy Tyeb Mehta Foundation

“Right now, India as a society may be more democratic, but there is also a lot of disparity … China is more even as a society, but it has a one-party system, which is a big difference,” he said while visiting Nature Morte’s gallery on the outskirts of Delhi for his first-ever solo exhibition in India.

In another interview he said: “Classically, the so-called West has pointed fingers at China or those with more authoritarian states, but I have been censored in the West very often. There is strong censorship in Western universities, in art, in writing, in media, in everything. No longer can fingers be pointed at China. If you are doing that, you are a hypocrite and have double standards”.

ai weiwei
Works at Ai Weiwei’s show at Nature Morte’s Dhan Mill gallery in Delhi, photo courtesy Nature Morte, Ai Weiwei Studio,and Galleria Continua

Tyeb retrospective

Attempts have been made to stage a Tyeb retrospective for 15 years or more. The success this month was due to an initiative started by the Saffronart Foundation, set up by the South Asian art auction market leader of that name. Saffronart approached the Tyeb Mehta Foundation, and then involved Delhi’s Kiran Nadar Museum of Modern Art (KNMA). That led to the show being curated by Roobina Karode, the museum’s artistic director, that is open till June. 

Tyeb paintingFalling Figure and Bird

“Tyeb came at a time of great struggle when all the Progressives were seeking foundational language in the name of modernism,” said Karode, referring to the Mumbai based group of artists founded in 1947. The question was “how to reflect the transformation that the country was going through”.

Tyeb was a leading member of the Progressives. Others included F.N. Souza (who died in 2002) and Krishen Khanna, now 100, both of whom have had recent commemorative exhibitions.  

“:Blue Painting” (1982), one of Tyeb’s calmer works with “less angst” according to one observer

Tyeb was “the most introverted’ of the Progressives and stayed away from the limelight”. Krishen Khanna had said that he was “a better artist” than the rest of the group. He came from a cinema family and was initially drawn to films but switched to painting in art college.

Titled Bearing Weight (with the lightness of being), the KNMA exhibition consists of 120 works including 70 paintings along with drawings, sculptures and a 1970 film plus letters and other archival material.

The works display Tyeb’s instantly recognisable themes and images of a rickshaw puller, a bull, a falling figure and a bird that dominate almost all his works. They demonstrate human hardships, conflict, violence and resilience. Often there is an iconic diagonal line to split the theme.

A bull was a compulsive image for Tyeb throughout his life from the time he drew them at an abattoir in the 1950s.

The exhibition includes Trussed Bull (1956). Loaned to the exhibition by its owner, this powerful painting is one of two works with this name sold at Saffronart auctions last year. This one fetched Rs 56.4 crore ($6,4m) in October 2025 but the other one was sold for Rs61.80 crore ($7.3m) six months earlier, making it the most valuable Tyeb Mehta work at auction.

Partition was a major theme, as it was for others of this generation including Satish Gujral, an artist, who died in 2020 and whose 100th birth anniversary has been celebrated with three exhibitions in Delhi. These include an expansive and dramatic retrospective in the National Gallery of Modern Art that shows how this reclusive artist (and architect), who suffered from a serious loss of hearing, stood aside from the Progressives and developed his own distinctive style.

At the art fair, Aicon Contemporary from New York showed this work by Debanjan Roy, which attacks so called tools of progress by attaching an image of Mahatma Gandhi, India’s leading independence campaigner, to a JCB digger

With 135 exhibitors including 83 galleries and 16 museums, the 17th edition of the art fair was its usual success, drawing in masses of young visitors as well as collectors ranging from beginners to top business people and museum owners. 

The fair took place at a time when galleries and auction houses say the majority of buyers are Indian and new to the market. Enthusiasm varied but good sales were reported by galleries such as Delhi’s Vadehra, DAG and Dhoomimal, and by Continua and David Zwirner from abroad.

Posted by: John Elliott | February 3, 2026

F.N.Souza’s grandson Solomon has his debut art show in Mumbai

Theme of Hard Labour – birth, family and manual work

A rebel, like his grandfather, he started with graffiti then murals 

Solomon Souza paints fast. He had to he says when he began doing graffiti around the age of 12. “In the street you have to be fast, or you finish up in jail”.  When he moved on to painting more acceptable wall murals, it was expensive hiring cranes, so speed was again important. 

But there’s more to it than that. “Painting should be a burst of energy when you have an idea. It has to be done there and then,” Soloman told me while he was painting – in just three or four hours – a 12ft x 8ft mural (below) that is now hanging outside an exhibition of his work at the Cymroza Gallery in Mumbai.

© John Elliott

“I love tackling large space and I rarely go back to change a work,” he said. “Your energy changes and you yourself change”. 

Age 32, energetic and an enthusiast who speaks quickly, Solomon is the grandson of F.N. Souza, one of India’s most famous masters and a leading member of the Mumbai-based Progressives group that included names such as Tyeb Mehta, M.F.Husain, and S.H.Raza.

Souza’s 100th birth anniversary in 2024 is still being celebrated with exhibitions of his works including tortured and evocative canvases and line drawings of figures, often nude, and of townscapes, many with religious overtones.

Solomon says he always wanted to draw, or doodle, but he is known for huge murals that he has done from Israel to Goa. Cymroza’s is his first solo show for conventional paintings and is open till February 14. There are about 15 larger works with a variety of materials including oil, acrylic and poster paint on canvas and wood, and 50 smaller works on paper using oil bars, pastels and wax markers. 

© John Elliott

In some, he clearly has his grandfathers’ iconic works in mind, notably urban roof and cityscapes like the 12ft x 8ft mural, but the title of the exhibition is Hard Labour – “the working man and the labour of birth, building a family”, he says. 

The focal point on entering the exhibition is a dramatically coloured work with that title (left), which combines the double theme with a naked woman who is pregnant and is labouring with a heavy mallet.

In an introduction to the exhibition, Solomon writes “Hard labour is all around us in myriad forms from the raising of a family to the building and maintenance of our cities and societies. Both are foundational in the fabric of existence…My first solo exhibition is about that hidden uncelebrated effort”.

The largest work is Fruits of Labour, a 69in x 48in oil on canvas that he describes as a “tip of the hat” to his grandfather’s famous and visually similar Birth.  Fruits of Labour (below) commemorates the birth of Solomon’s mother Keren, the daughter of F.N. Souza and his influential partner and muse Lisolette, a Czech-Jewish actress who fled from Prague to London in 1939. 

© John Elliott

Birth, painted in 1955 (below), portrays Lisolette pregnant with Keren, the first of their three daughters. It has set records twice for modern India art at Christie’s auctions – the sterling equivalent of$2.5m (including buyer’s premium) in London in June 2008 and $4.01m in New York in 2015. It is now in Delhi’s Kiran Nadar Museum of Art.

Next to Fruits of Labour is Life (below) that I felt had Buddhist overtones. It celebrates Solomon’s son’s birth and depicts him turning in the womb. Unlike all the other works, it is not, his wife has insisted, for sale. 

Titled “Life”, this marks Solomon’s son turning in his wife’s womb

“Solomon’s work has a unique freshness, showcasing a remarkable artistic talent for drawing,” says Pheroza Godrej who owns the gallery. “While portraying the themes of human birth and manual labour can be challenging, he has successfully accomplished this”.

Tough manual labouring features in many paintings, some seeming to echo the work of Krishen Khanna, 100, a close friend of F.N.Souza, and the only prominent surviving member of the Progressives. 

Solomon says he didn’t realise the full impact of his lineage till he went with his mother in 2010 to a Christie’s auction in London. The squabbling family was selling many of his grandfather’s works in a massive auction of 152 lots. Almost all the lots sold, many doubling estimates with a total hammer price of £4.4m. (I was there and reported it here).

“I went in my school uniform. I didn’t really realise it was a sale of the estate, but the seriousness of the event was a big slap of reality, that all these fancily dressed people had come to see and buy my grandfather’s works,” says Solomon.

Keren took him when he was nine on what he describes as her “spiritual journey” to live in Israel where he grew up in her art studio. Graffiti with a spray can started when he was about 12 on his school walls in a town near Jerusalem. That was “in revenge for detention”. Sometimes he painted marijuana leaf, having “never touched it”.

In his teens, he was sent back to the UK for schooling. Living in Hackney in east London which was “saturated in graffiti”, he knew it was illegal but was rebellious like his grandfather so continued with “naming and tagging” what he painted. 

“As I grew, my sense of adventure grew, and I found myself more and more frequently in trouble with the law, spending many nights in cells, with the burn of the handcuffs still sizzling upon my wrists,” he told Vivek Menezes, an art curator and festival organiser in Goa, who knew his grandfather in New York. 

He returned to Jerusalem age 18 having failed his “O levels” in art because “I hadn’t done my homework. He wanted to go to art school in London, but Keren “begged him not to”, saying she could teach him art. “You don’t need to be told what you are,” she said.

Back in Jerusalem, his views on graffiti changed. “I felt it was a beautiful holy place, and I shouldn’t do graffiti”. He turned to murals and street art, “trying to add value”.

He became famous for spray painting some 300 works over two years on the shutters of stalls in the Mahane Yehuda (Camp of Judah) market. “The souk had seen a lot of violence and hadn’t recovered; there was a sadness and people avoided the area. So, we painted portraits of people who worked there on the shutters, then bars opened and it became a bustling centre”. 

Menezes persuaded Solomon to move to Goa in 2019 and paint what has become a total of 20 murals including the side of a five-storey building (above) that was done in one day. In 2020 he even went stadium-scale in London for the Chelsea Football Club. 

smaller works (on paper below)

He feels at home in Goa with his wife and children though, he says, “I regard myself as Jewish and my heart is in Jerusalem”. He painted most of the exhibition’s works in India where he says he “found a new spark”. 

I watched his energy for two hours or so at the Cymroza in the Breach Candy area of Mumbai when he was painting the large 12ft x 8ft board with poster paint using rollers and small spray guns. “His work has been highly acclaimed for its daring style, technical proficiency, and influence on culture, especially in wall art – mural painting, such as the piece he created at the entrance of Cymroza Art Gallery,” says Pheroza Godrej.

When I arrived, he had completed the basic buildings of the Mumbai urban roofscape on a black background. “I like painting on black and enjoy how the colours jump out. You lose that vibrancy with a white background,” he said as he filled the black sky with short strokes creating a blueish whitish stream. 

Next, he strengthened the outline of the buildings and roofs with sprayed black lines, then blue spaces for windows, images of trees on prepared background and finally yellow for lights and more splashes of colour till finally the city scape was complete. 

There was a lot of his grandfather in the concept and the detail, but it was clearly Solomon’s inspiration, all completed in three to four hours. And he enjoyed it, which he said was important, and that sounded different and happier than his grandfather’s compulsions.

Declaration of interest: I bought two small paper works

© John Elliott
Posted by: John Elliott | January 25, 2026

“Tully Sahib”, the BBC’s voice in South Asia has died age 90

Sir Mark Tully was also once named the “Battered Sahib”

Remembered for the aptly named “Something Understood” radio programme

Perhaps no-one in living memory has spanned the two cultures of Britain and India as sensitively and closely as Sir Mark Tully, the BBC’s veteran broadcaster, who died in New Delhi age 90 today (January 25), a Sunday as he would have wished.

Parthiv Shah took this photograph at a political rally at Delhi’s “Boat Club” on Raj Path in 1991

His loss will be felt throughout South Asia and across the world where listeners to the BBC will remember the rich tones of his warm but powerful voice, not just reporting on India and its neighbours, but also leading Something Understood, a weekly faith and music-oriented BBC radio programme.

I first met Mark in Sri Lanka during the Tamil uprising of 1983 and quickly realised he was a tough and persistent reporter, but with a ready smile for people he met, charming them with fluent Hindi as well as his cultured English. He was a kind, caring and religious man, who once thought of becoming a priest. His broadcasting, and later his books, were often strongly influenced by a deep sense of right and wrong, which partly led to strong negative views about modern development. 

Mark Tully immersed himself in the countries he covered and developed a wide circle of friends and trusted contacts ranging from poor villagers to those at the top of government who frequented his home in Delhi. They all helped him deliver revealing reports that uncovered the stories of a region going through massive change. Later his books, with iconic titles like No Full Stops in India that was published in 1991vividly portrayed aspects of life in the remotest parts of the subcontinent.

Famous on the BBC’s radio air waves across South Asia, he was scrupulous about his detachment, even though he was specially lauded in Pakistan in the 1980s. People there listened out for his radio reports on the Movement for the Restoration of Democracy (MRD) that aimed at unseating the country’s military dictator, General Zia ul-Haq. I remember how, in a country where the media had little freedom, the BBC brought hope crackling down the airwaves with news of the MRD’s rallies and protests. 

January 2025 at lunch on Delhi’s Gymkhana Club lawns© John Elliott

The Bangladesh media has remembered how he performed a similar service during the 1971 war that led to the country being created out of what was Pakistan. “His BBC radio reports became the people’s chief source of authentic information,” says The Daily Star. He was named a Foreign Friend of Bangladesh in 2012.

Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister, described Mark Tully on X as “a towering voice of journalism”. His “reporting and insights” had left ” an enduring mark on public discourse”.

Mark was the BBC’s New Delhi-based bureau chief for 20 years and foreign correspondents were frequently chased by children calling out “Are you Mark Tully, Are you Mark Tully?”. One day, near the Pakistani city of Hyderabad, a colleague and I were asked the question at a chai stall. “Yes, I am!”, I said, exasperated by the repeated questions. Stirring the chai, the stall holder spoke to me in his own language and, when I didn’t reply, declared “You’re not Mark Tully, you don’t speak Urdu!”.

Sometimes the Tully name was used more threateningly. In December 1992, he had become the symbol of all that was resented about the international media by the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Hindu extremists who were targeting foreign journalists after demolishing a revered sixteenth century Muslim mosque in Ayodhya. (A new Hindu temple was opened on the site by prime minister Narendra Modi early in 2024). 

Tully escaped with some other journalists, rescued by a nearby temple priest. “We were surrounded by a huge mob screaming, ‘Death to Mark Tully!’ and ‘Death to BBC!’,” he later told the Los Angeles Times for a profile headed “The BBC’s Battered Sahib: Mark Tully has been expelled by India, chased by mobs and picketed. He loves his job”.

His big events ranged from India-Pakistan wars, the Russian occupation of Afghanistan and the foundation of Bangladesh, to the uprisings in Sri Lanka and elsewhere. I saw him centre stage on stories like the Indian army’s storming of the Sikh Golden Temple in Amritsar, the assassination of prime minister Indira Gandhi, and Union Carbide’s Bhopal gas disaster. He was always aware that what he said on the air waves could have a much more immediate and maybe cataclysmic impact than most newspaper reports.

He irritated and infuriated successive governments and was expelled from India along with other foreign correspondents during Indira Gandhi’s 1975-77 State of Emergency, but was awarded the highest civilian honours. In India he received the Padma Shri (for distinguished service) in 1992 and the Padma Bhushan (for distinguished service of higher order) in 2005. In the UK, he was knighted for his contribution to journalism in 2002, though he rarely used his full Sir Mark Tully title.

Mark was born on October 24, 1935, in Calcutta (now Kolkata), where his father was with Gillander Arbuthnot, a British managing agency firm. His mother’s family had worked for generations in what is now Bangladesh. 

He was brought up, colonial style, with a European nanny, then at a British boarding school in Darjeeling north of Calcutta. His teenage school years were spent at Marlborough College in the UK.

with his partner Gilly at Kipling Camp, Madhya Pradesh, for Christmas 2011 – and Kim, the resident labrador© Belinda Wright

That was followed by Trinity Hall at Cambridge University, where he studied theology, but abandoned the idea of becoming a Church of England priest after two terms at a theological college. 

Mark often said that he didn’t think his lifestyle would have fitted with being a priest, mentioning beer and whisky, and sometimes talking about his complex personal life. “There’s always been a dichotomy in my character – very religious, yet morally really rather bad,” he told The Independent newspaper in 1994. “I simply wasn’t confident of my own moral integrity,” he said in a interview with The Hindu newspaper. “And the Church mattered enough to me — as it still does — so that I didn’t want to let it down.”

He remained married to his wife Margaret after she returned to London from India in the early 1980s, and spent the rest of his life based in Delhi with his partner, devoted assistant, and sometimes co-author Gillian (Gilly) Wright

“It reflects great credit on my wife and on Gillian,” he said in the Independent interview. “After such a long relationship, I didn’t want a divorce and have to write ‘finis’. I wanted to remain friendly with her (Margaret) and my children.” Asked about this in a 2004 interview with the Cambridge University alumni magazine Cam, he replied: “I can’t speak for my wife or Gilly….Of course, I am not comfortable with the situation, not least because it doesn’t conform with the teachings of the Church”.

After abandoning what he saw as his vocation as a priest, he did not know what to do, so taught for a while and then spent four years working with a housing charity in Cheshire.

His life was transformed when he joined the BBC in 1964. A year later he moved to India, initially in management but quickly transferring to reporting, becoming the bureau chief, a post he held for 22 years. Aided by his deputy, Satish Jacob, and in later years by Gilly, he travelled extensively across the sub-continent, building relationships that included top political leaders and covering ordinary people’s miseries and their gradually changing lives as well as the big events.

With Mark at my farewell party as FT correspondent, July 1988

If there has been criticism of his coverage, it is that he was – and remained – too critical and opposed to the development and modernisation that has replaced traditional lifestyles and attitudes. He did not of course advocate continuing poverty or a lack of development, but he refused to accept that western-style consumerism and other forms of change were the way to achieve progress. He was also a virulent critic of the current Indian government’s Hindu nationalism.

No Full Stops had been “didactic”, he later admitted (in the preface to his next book) pleading that, along with economic growth, it was also necessary to “protect the country’s ancient culture, not merely ape….the sterile materialism of the modern Western culture”. 

He was not afraid to air unfashionable views, as he showed over India’s widely condemned caste system on the BBC’s Desert Island Discs in 2003. “We have to look to the good and the bad in the caste system,” he argued. “The good side of it is that it offers security, it offers companionship, a community to belong to and that sort of thing.”

Mark has said that his passion for India was greater than his passion for journalism. He was happiest travelling the country talking to contacts and reporting and commenting on radio  what he saw and heard. 

He did not easily adapt to television and the BBC’s increased commercialisation, and thought change should come by “evolution not revolution”. That led to him resigning from the BBC in 1994 after he was told to stop voicing his criticisms. But he continued to do occasional programmes – in 2017 for India’s 70th year of independence, he and Gilly made a memorable cross-country journey that combined his hobby as a railway buff with reflections on the emerging India, 

Away from the constraints of daily reporting, Mark became a prolific author producing a total of more than a dozen books that vividly explored life in India with titles like India in Slow Motion and India’s Unending Journey as well as No Full Stops. Recently he was in the final stages of editing a memoir-style autobiography that Gilly will now complete.

Mark was also celebrated as the leading host on Something Understood, the BBC Radio 4’s Sunday morning programme of words and music that started in 1995. Listeners tuned in from all over the world. Focussed around faith, spirituality, and human life, this took him back to his original vocation till the BBC ended the series in 2019.

Regretting the BBC’s decision, Mark told the Radio Times magazine that he felt sad because he knew a lot of listeners liked it. “They say two things to me about it – that there is nothing else like it on the radio, and that this is what radio should be all about. And I think that’s true.” So many listeners instantly mention this when they hear the name Mark Tully – and tune in when the BBC runs repeats.

Mark is survived by his wife Margaret and four children, Sarah, Sam, Emma and Patrick, and by his partner Gillian.

“Island of Ireland JLF” programme will include India’s and Ireland’s shared colonial history

Reunification of Ireland debated at Jaipur lit fest last weekend

Shared experiences of British colonial rule will come to the fore when India’s Jaipur Literature Festival travels in May from Belfast to Dublin with a band of writers, commentators and artists, staging a total of four lit fests over ten days.

Announced last weekend at the 19th annual lit fest in Jaipur, this will be added to more than 12 destinations where the festival is held including London, Valladolid in Spain, New York and Colorado in the US, the Maldives, and Adelaide in Australia.

It will be the first time that JLF, as it is known, has toured with four linked events, and crossed a border. Called Island of Ireland JLF, it will also be the most politically and diplomatically sensitive festival because of the controversial history of empire. In the wings will be the sensitive issue of Irish reunification that would reverse the 1921 partition when the Anglo-Irish Treaty created Northern Ireland as a separate entity within the UK.

“This will be a platform for dialogue on shared histories and literary and cultural traditions between Ireland and India in what will be almost a caravan of literature moving from the north to the south through the border counties,” says Kevin Kelly, Ireland’s ambassador in New Delhi, who has been a driving force behind plans for the tour. 

At last year’s Jaipur lit fest, there was strong criticism of empire in many sessions. That crystallised last weekend with special emphasis on the similarities between Ireland and India’s experiences with British colonialism and the horrors of partition, expanding to include Palestine and Israel.

Even Arun Maira, an uncontroversial economist and a former member of the Planning Commission, followed the growing trend of criticising British rule when he talked (accurately) about India’s economy being “denuded by the British”. That fits with the piece I wrote on January 10 about the Singh Twins’ art exhibition at Kew Gardens in London that exposes the role of Kew and its botanists in the British empire’s “darker side”.

“If you think the British mucked up India in 1947, just wait till you hear what they did in Palestine in 1948,” declared William Dalrymple, the lit fest’s co-director, referring to Pakistan’s partition from India and the creation of Israel, as he sat down on the festival stage to open a session on the subject.

“Ireland was the UK’s first colony, and it was a laboratory for empire,” Jane Ohlmeyer, a leading historian at Dublin University who is closely involved in the May tour, said during one of the sessions. Repeating what she had said last year at the festival, she explained that British colonisation “began in the 12th century [with mercenaries] and became intense [with direct rule] in the 17th century and then more acute” in the 20th century. “We are victims of colonialism and imperialism,” she declared.

Sanjoy Roy, founder and managing director Teamwork Arts

Referring to Northern Ireland with its alternative name of Ulster, Ohlmeyer said Mahatma Gandhi, India’s freedom fighter, had declared, without success, that he did not want his country to be partitioned as the British had done with “Ulsterisation” in Ireland.  

“We’ll be looking at some of the common issues of colonialism and imperialism, “says Sanjoy Roy, founder and head of Teamwork Arts that has produced the Jaipur festival for 19 years.

“There are the issues of famine and migration,” he added, linking the 1845 Irish potato famine with its mass starvation, disease and migration, with the Bengal famine in 1943 when the Britih prime minister Winston Churchill was condemned (fairly or unfairly) for diverting aid to World War 2 troops instead of helping Bengal.

The common themes seem endless. On top of partitions and famine, there are shared experiences of religious sectarianism, cultural clashes, violence, mass deaths, nationalism, identity, and migration.

There are also many links, some which even surprise those involved. Leo Varadkar, Ireland’s former Taoiseach (prime minster), whose father was born in the western Indian state of Maharashtra, told the festival last weekend that he discovered how his family had suffered from British imperialism when he paid an official visit to India in 2019. 

He was clearly proud that two of his uncles were imprisoned by the British as freedom fighters, and that an aunt was involved in a march to Goa “to liberate it from the Portuguese”. Politics “was clearly in my blood,” said Varadkar, who is a strong supporter of reunification that he believes could happen in his lifetime.

Leo Varadkar is given a birthday cake after he spoke on January 18 – with Ireland’s ambassador Kevin Kelly on the right

Ireland’s past under British rule helped him understand Palestinian sentiments. “When Britain tried to conquer Ireland, it justified its claim through religion. That history gives perspective,” he said, adding that the US finds it difficult to understand the Palestinian issue due to its close ties with Israel. 

Notable Irish writers at the festival in recent years have included Booker Prize winner Colm Tóibín and novelist Michelle Gallen (both last weekend) as well as Jane Ohlmeyer. Earlier names have included Booker prize winners Anne Enright and Roddy Doyle 

Also this year, journalists Finan O’Toole from Dublin and Sam McBride from the north discussed their jointly written bookFor and Against a United Ireland, which was published in the UK last October. O’Toole echoed the growing support in the south for reunification and argued it would benefit the north’s declining economic prospects. The UK government agreed in 1998 that “it would go whenever Ulster people wanted it to” after holding a referendum.

McBride however saw “no logical argument” for uniting the country because of the currently manageable soft border, and the risk that extremist gangs could use a referendum “to drive us into violence”. 

JLF’s association with Ireland began about ten years ago when the Arts Council of Northern Ireland urged Roy to stage a lit fest in Belfast, explaining that it would be more likely than a festival from the UK to attract audiences from both the Catholic and Protestant communities. That led to a successful event in 2019 though there were some tensions. 

Roy says it led him to think of having a lit fest as a caravan travelling south from Belfast, as will happen for ten days from May 22, “pitching tents” on either side of the border at Armagh and Dundalk before finishing up in Dublin. “Can the art of conversation and dialogue be a way to explore these differences and overcome the fears generated by different religions?” he asks.

Like all the lively JLF festivals, the more controversial sessions will meld with the rest that will draw on Ireland and India’s culture, fiction, and the arts as well as wider issues.

Kew invited the artists, the Singh Twins, to explore Kew’s archives and plants, and track the links to colonisation

The important role played by Britain’s Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew in the country’s controversial colonial history is being graphically exposed and criticised by an art exhibition that challenges the image of the peaceful green spaces with their rare plants, magnificent trees and iconic glasshouses. 

Kew Gardens, as it’s usually known, invited the Singh Twins (below), who are established artists of Indian origin living in Liverpool, to focus their critical approach to the British empire on the institution’s massive and rare botanical collection contained both in extensive archives and as live plants.

The result is an exhibition titled SINGH TWINS: Botanical Tales and Seeds of Empire that is open till April 12 in the Gardens’ Shirley Sherwood Gallery of Botanical Art. It reflects the way that museums and other British institutions have become increasingly willing in recent years to look into their collections and expose what the twins call “the darker side of what is revealed”.

Kew’s role in colonisation comes alive with a dramatic series of large back-lit works of art on fabric. These show how plants such as cotton, spices and dyes played a pivotal role in Britain’s colonial expansion as well as more positively in the transfer of botanical knowledge and experience across continents. There are also smaller works on the symbolism and significance of plants in global trade, and a tough film highlighting the negative message.

“The Singh Twins were a natural choice because of their unique ability to combine rigorous historical research with a powerful contemporary artistic voice,” Maria Devaney the galleries and exhibition leader told me.

“Kew’s history is closely entwined with Britain’s imperial past, and it’s important to acknowledge and respond to those complexities. We have a responsibility to engage honestly with our own history and with the wider histories that shape our collections and our work today. This is part of Kew’s ongoing commitment to inclusion and to presenting, plants, science and culture in their full historical contexts”.

Christopher Doyle photographer

The toughest message comes in an allegorical work titled Imperialism: By the Yardstick and Sword that focuses, says the exhibition’s coffee-table style catalogue, on “the impoverishment and enslavement of India under western colonial expansion and in particular British rule”.

The main figure is a female warrior representing Western Imperialism standing above a tiger, piercing it in the mouth.  Smaller images surrounding the figure illustrate the exploitation with a quotation saying, “India was ruthlessly conquered as an outlet for British goods”, which actively contributed to the “destruction of India’s industries”.

Imperialism: By the Yardstick and Sword” – the main figure symbolises Western Imperialism surrounded by examples of its impact

The Golden Bird: Envy of the West “shows an allegorical figure representing pre-colonial India” before the British arrived. It was a “fabled land of untold riches and prosperity”. 

Dying for a Cuppa deals with the “British colonial history of tea”, highlighting the tea trade’s “links with sugar and opium, commodities inextricably linked to enslavement, conflict, violence, land grabbing, deforestation and drug addiction”.

The Twins say Kew was aware of their work and had seen an earlier exhibition in 2018 on the same theme in Liverpool. This demonstrated, they say, Kew’s “willingness to look at its collections in a different light and bring out those histories….they knew exactly what they were buying into”.  When the Twins pointed out that they would be looking at the “darker side” of Imperialism, they were told “this is actually what we want you to do”.

They were “overwhelmed” by the breadth of Kew’s documentation, processing, and archiving of material relating to plants, but they had already done research and “knew what we wanted to get out of it”. That was to look at colonial links in botany following on from their Liverpool exhibition in 2018 where they focussed on similar narratives connected to India’s historical trade in cotton and other textile links.

“Kew was a central cog in the economic exploitation of plants, playing a key role in the Empire’s collection transportation and cultivation of commercial crops such as cotton, rubber and cinchona,” says Richard Deverell, the Gardens’ director and ceo, in an introduction to the catalogue.

Showing alongside the Twins’ works, under an overall Flora Indica title, is the first-ever public display of 52 rediscovered botanical watercolours (above) by Indian artists who were commissioned by British botanists between 1790 and 1850. Hidden for over a century, the works show how artists helped shape botanical knowledge from India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Myanmar. The Twins studied these and other archived works commissioned by Britain’s East India Company that controlled India for a century till 1858.

Over the past 17 years, the Twins have been exploring and exposing what they describe as the “exploitative nature of colonialism and empire”. They are proud of having “always spoken loudly about things we believe”. 

Born in the UK with a Sikh father who emigrated from India in 1947, Amrit Kaur Singh and Rabindra Kaur Singh are identical twins in their late 50s. They always dress alike and talk together, interrupting and finishing each other’s sentences. Their father, and their Sikh background, flow through many of the works.

The Golden Bird: Envy of the West” – India is personified “with the world at her feet”, along with depictions below of European merchants, soldiers and others who invaded her

The Twins adapt the intricate and colourful style of Mughal miniature paintings into a form of pop art where a series of individual small compositions cluster around a central image, together telling a multi-illustrated story. With up to around 15 images in a single work, the Twins estimate that the Kew exhibition has more than 200 compositions.

That was apparent when I first interviewed them, in 2011, at an exhibition in New Delhi that combined challenging the misuse of power by the Indian and other governments with recording the lives of Indians living in Liverpool and elsewhere in the UK. “They have been fighting convention since they were at university in Liverpool,” I wrote. The show included Partners in Crime, Deception and Lies with US president George W. Bush and UK prime minister Tony Blair standing on a burning blood-strewn globe of the world after the invasion of Iraq.  

That was the year that they were both awarded an MBE, becoming Members of the Order of the British Empire. Their art had been shown in 2010 at London’s National Portrait Gallery, which describes their work as continuing “a long tradition of artistic interaction and influence between cultures”.

As students in Liverpool, they were told that the Indian miniatures style was no longer relevant and that they should be learning from Matisse, Gaugin and Picasso. “We said that Gaugin and others had been influenced by India and other foreign works, and that we were being denied our own way of expressing ourselves,” was their reply. “There was pressure to conform to Western ideas, but we were challenging accepted notions of heritage and identity”.

A triptych dedicated to the memory of the Twins’ late father, Dr Karnail Singh, in “The Perfect Garden” with “The Arts of Botany” (left) and “The Science of Botany” (right)

Their interest in the negative aspects of colonialism began when they were part of a British Arts Council trip in 2014 to the French city of Nantes in Upper Brittany. There they visited the Château des Ducs museum that has a large section on slavery marking the Atlantic coastal port’s significant role in the international trade, similar to Liverpoool’s.

A detailed picture on the “Science of Botany”

They also found displays of Indian textiles commissioned by French traders to be sold to African tribal chiefs as part of the slave trade, which made them realise the wide range of the trade beyond the transatlantic triangle

That led to the 2018 exhibition, titled Slaves of Fashion, at Liverpool’s Walker Art Gallery where the Twins developed their criticism of empire by focussing on the history of Indian textiles, especially cotton, enslavement and luxury consumerism. That is “a global story of conflict, conquest, slavery, environmental exploitation, cultural exchange and changing fashion,” they say, relating it also to current debates on ethical consumerism, racism and the politics of trade. 

Another detailed picture on the “Science of Botany” including the words “Disease, Massacres, Enslavement, Displacement, Conflict

The Kew exhibition’s hard-hitting short film King Cotton: An Artist’s Tale was first shown in Liverpool and focusses on textiles. Set to a poem written by the twins and narrated by Amrit, it pulls no punches with lines like: “Torture was used to enforce taxation, and monopoly of salt caused devastation – to the mases steeped in poverty…..so that England’s exports might expand, thumbs were broken on weavers’ hands… …the tools of their trade were seized and smashed while Indian servants were routinely thrashed”.

The film’s rhyming poetry is good but there will be objections to some of the criticisms, notably weavers’ “thumbs being broken” that was first voiced in 1853 by Karl Marx. An earlier report in 1772 by William Bolts, a Dutch-born British merchant and employee of the East India Company, suggested that winders of raw silk were treated so badly that they cut off their thumbs to avoid being forced to work, though that is also represented in the film.

Critics will say that the show does not illustrate sufficiently the world-wide benefits reaped by early explorers and botanists who faced extreme challenges travelling to Asia and elsewhere centuries ago. 

Cinchona: What’s in a Namewith an “English family unperturbed by the mosquitos encircling their domesticated environment” in the centre, and “competing interests in quinine production” in the surrounding border

The exhibition includes a work, Cinchona: What’s in a Name marking how in 1860 a British expedition to South America smuggled out cinchona seeds and plants that led to the development of quinine to treat malaria. Planted extensively in British India and Sri Lanka those stolen seeds and plants saved millions of lives, until an artificial synthesis of quinine was developed in 1944, but the Twins introduce it negatively saying it was “significant in the colonisation of tropical countries”.

“Plants are an essential resource for human survival and they are also the foundation of practically all life on earth,” says one prominent habitat conservationist. “Yes, exotic plants were collected clandestinely in colonial times, just as they are today. But the efforts of those early collectors also brought huge benefits, particularly in the field of medicine”.

That does not however reduce from the importance of the Twins work, displaying in masses of intricate and highly colourful works, the links between botany and the negative side of empire  

Posted by: John Elliott | December 24, 2025

Merry Christmas!

To all friends and followers of this blog, Seasons Greetings and all best wishes for 2026 – with this splendid painting by Jabbu, a Gond tribal artist from the Indian State of Madhya Pradesh

Posted by: John Elliott | December 6, 2025

Putin enjoys a glittering but short state visit to Delhi

Modi and Putin praise each other and the India-Russia relationship

UK France and German ambassadors write in Times of India against Ukraine war

It could have been a tightrope walk, but President Vladimir Putin’s state visit to India during the past two days was so well stage-managed that it was a success both for him and prime minister Narendra Modi. Putin was showing the world that he could still be treated as a global statesman by a significant world power despite the invasion of Ukraine, and Modi was showing Donald Trump that he had alternative powerful friends to the US president. Together, they were giving a signal to the West of a signficant play in global politics.

The display of personal bonhomie began the moment Putin landed in Delhi on Thursday evening and shared Modi’s car to a private dinner. That led on Friday to the best pageantry and hospitality that India could provide, along with joint public statements and a mass of well-meaning agreements with a target set last year of $100bn trade by 2030.

While the visit only lasted just over 24 hours, it was one of the most significant and high profile of the two countries’ 23 annual summits and it gave much-needed fresh impetus to the relationship. But it was knocked off what would have been wall-to-wall television news coverage by pandemonium at India’s airports when over a thousand airline flights were cancelled due to operational problems.

Image: GRIGORY SYSOYEV/AFP/Getty Images

The agreements aimed at developing economic and business ties to expand the relationship beyond its current defence and energy focus. But they did not go so far as Putin might have hoped.

They did not commit India to continue buying controversial Russian oil, which is being significantly reduced having mushroomed after the Ukraine invasion when it caused a rift between India and the US. Nor did they include major new orders for Russia’s S-400 missile defence system, which India is already using, nor joint production in India of Sukhoi Su-57 fifth generation jet fighters. That has given Trump less to complain about at a time when India is trying to finalise a US trade deal. 

The annual summit is usually a bilateral event of only modest international significance. If Trump had not upset 25 years of work by successive US leaders coaxing India gradually to move away from its historic Soviet and Russian allegiances, it would probably not have hit the world headlines this week, apart from the focus on Ukraine. 

But Trump’s imposition of 50% tariffs in July, coupled with criticisms of the Modi regime for buying Russian oil, upset that and led to Modi showing that he could be as close to Putin as he was to Trump in the past. 

“India Today tv cartoon video showing Putin and Modi filling a motorcycle from a Russia petrol pump, ignoring Trump at his USA pump

The visit could have turned into a trilateral with Trump interrupting from the US as a social media interloper but he has – so far – remained uncharacteristically silent. (He spent part of yesterday receiving FIFA’s surprise first Peace Prize at the World Cup draw in Washington). That has led to speculation that he knows he cannot now object to Modi being close to Putin when he is trying to negotiate a Ukraine peace settlement with business overtones. There are also signs of the US reaffirming its support for India’s role internationally.

Also in Modi’s and Putin’s minds would have been Xi Jinping, China’s president, who has been developing close links with Russia and is also patching up relationships with India after years of tense and sometimes hostile engagements on their undefined border. Modi has to be suspicious of Putin’s relationship with Xi, especially since China provides India’s hostile neighbour Pakistan with aircraft, missiles and other support.

Putin’s last visit to Delhi was four years ago this week during the covid crisis, two months before he launched the invasion of Ukraine. The visit lasted just five hours. Since then, he and Modi have had a total of 16 conversations, 11 between 2022 and 2024 five times this year.

At a regional summit in China on September 1, Putin ostentatiously invited Modi into his limousine for an hour’s private conversation. Modi said that “even in the most difficult circumstances India and Russia have walked together, shoulder to shoulder. Our close co-operation is important not just to our two countries but for global peace, stability and prosperity”. 

Continuing the upbeat emphasis on the relationship, a detailed Indian government statement issued on December 4 described Russia as a “longstanding and time-tested partner” and said the countries had a “Special and Privileged Bond”. 

Putin in Modi’s car when he’s just arrived (left) and (right) greeting the next day

Putin said in a long 100-minute interview with India Today tv before he left Moscow that Modi was “a person of integrity” who was “very sincere” about “strengthening Indian Russian ties across the whole range of areas, especially crucial issues of economy and defence and humanitarian cooperation, development of hi-tech”. 

“It is very interesting to meet with him,” Putin added. “He travelled here, and we sat with him at my residence and we drank tea for the whole evening, and we discussed different topics. We simply had an interesting conversation purely like humans…. The Indian people can certainly take pride in their leader”. 

Putin also said Russia was “a reliable supplier of oil” to India and was “ready to provide uninterrupted fuel supplies”. The US had continued to buy nuclear fuel from Russia so “why shouldn’t India have the same privilege!”.

At a joint media conference however, Modi said energy security had been a “strong and vital pillar of the India‑Russia partnership”, but avoided the oil purchases and defence deals. Instead, he mentioned the value of the two countries’ long-standing “win-win” co-operation in civil nuclear energy which they would continue to take forward”.

A major focus was on bilateral trade which rose sharply with the oil purchases to a record high of $68.7bn in 2024-25. That was made up by Russia’s (mainly oil) exports of $63.8bn while India’s totalled just $4.9bn. Putin was accompanied by a large business delegation, partly aimed to boosting what Russia buys from India. An India pharmaceutical factory in Russia plus investments in shipbuilding and critical minerals with encouragement for labour mobility and tourism are among the plans and proposals.

Perhaps the most unconventional and controversial diplomatic incident was an article written jointly by the British high commissioner in Delhi and the French and German ambassadors that was published on December 1 in theTimes of India. Titled “Russia doesn’t seem serious about peace”, it said: “Every day sees new indiscriminate Russian attacks in this illegal war, targeting civilian infrastructure, destroying homes, hospitals, and schools. These are not the actions of someone that is serious about peace”.

It is far from clear what the three countries’ ambassadors hoped to achieve, nor who they were trying to influence. They were rebuked by India’s foreign ministry for breaching “acceptable diplomatic practice”, and the Russian ambassador wrote a reply titled “Europe’s Four Treacheries are Impeding Peace in Ukraine”. 

The high commissioner’s and ambassadors’ article presumably reflected the view in Europe that it was unacceptable for Modi to lay on such an unconditionally splendid welcome when Russia is not only failing to negotiate a Ukraine peace deal but is also provoking European countries with military and cyber space manoeuvres. Coincidentally, as he flew into Delhi, Putin was personally blamed by a UK inquiry for the death in 2018 of a Salisbury resident accidentally infected by the Novichok nerve agent intended to kill a former Russian spy and UK double agent. There were also reports of the UK unfreezing £8bn of frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine.

Viewed however from Asia, which broadly regards Russia’s war with Ukraine as a distant problem for the West to deal with, Modi properly called for a peaceful solution, while Putin in his India Today tv interview mixed support for seeking resolution to the war with a hard line on winning the bitterly disputed Donbas region.

“We will finish it when we achieve the goals set at the beginning of the special military operation – when we free these territories”, Putin said, having just mentioned the Donbas when asked for his red lines. “Either we take back these territories by force, or eventually Ukrainian troops withdraw and stop killing people there”.

Posted by: John Elliott | November 16, 2025

Modi wins big election victory amid terror tensions with Pakistan

Authorities investigating Kashmiri bomb attack in Delhi 

BJP coalition win in Bihar strengthens Modi’s authority

Narendra Modi’s authority as India’s prime minister has been significantly strengthened by an unexpectedly massive win for his Bharatiya Janata Party’s coalition in the Bihar state elections at a time when he has to deal with relations with Pakistan that are at a tense and terror-related pivotal moment.

Modi’s National Democratic Alliance won 202 of the Bihar assembly’s 243 seats, up from just 125 in 2020 in results announced on November 14. The BJP topped the polls with 89 seats followed by the state-based Janta Dal (United) with 85. Nitish Kumar, the widely respected but ailing 74-year old leader of the JDU, who has been chief minister of this desperately poor state almost continuously since 2005, is to remain in the post. 

The special significance of this victory is that Modi does not need to distract attention and restore support for the BJP. It could have been different if his authority had been weakened by a defeat or marginal result in Bihar.

The explosives blast in Delhi – credit Sanjeev Verma/Hindustan Times/Getty Images

Modi is grappling with how to respond to a massive car bomb explosion near the Red Fort in old Delhi on November 10 that killed 13 people. Earlier this year in April, after a Pakistan-linked terrorist attack at Pahalgam in Kashmir that slaughtered 26 tourists and led to four-days of air-borne battles between the two countries, Modi said any future terror-induced incident would be treated as “an act of war”.

Modi and his National Investigation Agency (NIA) now have to decide whether the November 10 explosion was instigated, encouraged or facilitated by Pakistan. No organisation has claimed responsibility and Pakistan denies involvement, but Indian security sources are pointing to the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) that has close ties to the Pakistan military and the ISI security agency.

At the same time, Pakistan is accusing India of staging “state terrorism” with a suicide bombing that killed at least 12 people in the capital of Islamabad a day after the Delhi blast. India denies responsibility but the link stems from officials blaming the Pakistani Taliban (TTP), which is allied to the Afghanistan’s Taliban government at a time when it has been growing close to India.

The Indian government has confirmed it is treating the Delhi blast as a “terror incident” perpetrated by “anti-national forces”. Modi has described it as a “conspiracy” and Amit Shah, the home minister, said he would “hunt down each and every culprit behind this incident”.

Pakistan’s defence chief, Field Marshall Asim Munir

This is complicated however because, unlike the earlier terror attackers who came from Pakistan, last week’s explosion involved Indian nationals from Kashmir. Claimed by Pakistan, Kashmir has suffered varying degrees of internally and externally instigated insurgency and terrorism since India’s independence in 1947. 

Indian investigators have linked the blast to what they describe as “an interstate and transnational terror module” that they started tracking last month when posters promoting the JeM appeared in Nowgam, a village south of Srinagar that is at the centre of the disputed Kashmir territory.  

Seven people were arrested including two Kashmiri doctors working in other Indian states. Police said they had uncovered 2,900kg of highly volatile explosives equipment and assault rifles in Faridabad near Delhi, which they now believe were being readied by the doctors and their accomplices for attacks on various targets. They have described the network as a “white-collar ecosystem involving radicalised professionals and students in contact with foreign handlers operating from Pakistan and other countries”.  

The apparent emergence of such a terror group comprising professionals, and especially doctors who are widely trusted in security situations, has caused serious concern, though the radicalisation of white-collar groups has been seen before in Kashmir and elsewhere.

Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar with Narendra Modi

Complicating and delaying the investigation, the explosives seized in Faridabad were controversially transported 800 kms by mini-trucks to the police station in Nowgam for forensic examination. During handling, some of the volatile materials exploded on the night of November 14, killing nine people including police and forensic staff, and demolishing part of the police station. Officials say this was an accident, not an attack.

While the evidence may seem to point to Pakistan’s involvement, Modi has other issues to consider, notably a change in the triangular India-US-Pakistan relationship. In the past, India could assume that it would broadly have tacit US support for an attack on Pakistan after a terrorist incident, but that is no longer certain.

President Trump has become close to Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir (above), who is being given additional charge of the navy and air force as well as the security forces. This seems to involve powers approaching those of a military dictator, albeit within a (army dominated) parliamentary system. On November 11 Munir was also granted life-long legal immunity by the parliament. 

Trump has entertained Munir twice at the White House and described him as “my favourite field marshal”. This coincided with Trump’s previous close relations with Modi being upset by the Indian prime minister rejecting his claims that he brokered the end of the April four-day battle between the two nuclear powers. India is never willing to accept outside interference in its relations with Pakistan and Modi has repeatedly rejected Trump’s claims.

Trump also imposed 50% tariffs on India after talks on a trade deal floundered, and India continued to be a major buyer of Russian oil despite the Ukraine war. Those issues have now eased, with Trump saying the oil purchases have declined and a trade deal is near.

Trump continues to call Modi a “great friend”, and relations between the two countries remain stable across a range of issues. But if he were to consider an attack on Pakistan, Modi would have to be wary of Trump’s reactions and be ready for the American president to be swayed by Munir. He also has to remember that the April battles led to serious though unconfirmed aircraft losses by India as well as Pakistan.

BJP supporters celebrate in Patna, Bihar’s capital – credit BBC/Reuters photo

In Bihar, it always seemed likely that Modi’s NDA would win, but not by such a massive majority, routing the opposition including the Indian National Congress that won only five seats after alleging widespread election manipulation.

In addition to the pull of the BJP, the result is significantly due to the charisma and political experience of Nitish Kumar who authorised payments just before voting took place of Rs10,000 (£85) into the bank accounts of almost 15m women to start small ventures. 

That is despite what a visiting American commentator has written in the FT , maybe unfairly, about Kumar having “more obvious infirmities than Biden”. An Indian Express columnist has written that “the NDA’s landslide win in Bihar was, above all, about Nitish Kumar and Biharis’ ‘sahanubhuti (sympathy)’ for their leader and what many said was ‘shraddha (respect)’ for his stewardship over the last two decades”.

The BJP’s success is the latest of a series of significant state assembly victories in Haryana, Maharashtra, and Delhi following a mediocre general election result last year. Together with its NDA allies, it is in power in 21 of India’s 31 states and union territories. Modi has said his next target, early in 2026, is West Bengal where the BJP has previously failed to oust the state-based Trinamool Congress.

Christie’s score classical art records with Aga Khan family auction 

Mrinalini Mukherjee is first Indian to have a show at the RA since 1982 

Two events in London last week illustrate Indian art’s growing importance, both for moneyed collectors and for galleries and museums. Just as previews were starting on October 28 at the Royal Academy of Arts in Piccadilly for a much-heralded exhibition of works by renowned sculptor Mrinalini Mukherjee and her fellow artists, one of the most striking auctions for years was hitting record prices a few hundred yards away at Christie’s. 

Mrinalini Mukherjee’s 7ft high “Pakshi”© John Elliott

Bids were flowing for 95 classical Indian and Islamic works from the personal collection of Prince and Princess Sadruddin Aga Khan, part of the family of the Ismaili Muslim sect’s spiritual leader. Records were broken with sales totalling £45.76m.

At the Royal Academy (RA), the most striking work on show was Pakshi, Mukherjee’s iconic 7ft high suspended sculpture (left) of voluminous golden-brown to pinkish red knotted hemp resembling both a deity and a human figure. 

At Christie’s, headlines were grabbed for a 12in x 7in painting on cloth of a “family of cheetahs in a rocky landscape” (below), attributed between 1575 and 1580 to Basawan, a famous Indian Mughal artist who was said to have been a favourite of Emperor Akbar.

This established a record for a classical Indian or Islamic painting with a hammer price of £8.5m ($11.16m), an astonishing twelve times the low estimate, and £10.25m including fees.

The works were mostly acquired by Sadruddin and his wife between the 1960s and 1980s, and the sale attracted buyers who have been setting new records this year for 20th and 21st century modern Indian art as well as museums and other collectors from the Middle East and elsewhere. The £45.76m ($60m) total beat the top South Asian art auction record of $40.2m achieved at a Mumbai-based Saffronart sale of modern works on September 27.

Christie’s 16th century record breaking family of cheetah in a rock landscape

“This was a once in a lifetime opportunity to acquire very famous paintings from a highly illustrious collection,” says Hugo Weihe, an independent Indian art advisor. The prices achieved for the many relatively small paintings showed “that it is not always about size, but artistic merit and appreciating the full scope of cultural heritage.”

The overall sale was Christie’s second significant coup within a few months. It lagged behind other auction houses during the South Asia summer sales, but in March it achieved the highest auction price ever for an Indian painting – M.F. Husain’s 1954 Gram Yatra, which sold for $13.75m.

Mukherjee’s RA show, which continues till next February, is significant both for the artist and for Indian modern art at a time when international attention is growing with the high auction prices and increasing institutional interest in staging exhibitions. 

Mrinalini Mukherjee’s “Adi Pushp II” described as “a potent emblem of generative energy and affirming nature as a vital erotic life force”© John Elliott

This is the first exhibition of Indian modern art at the Royal Academy since the 1982 Festival of India in the UK that was driven by the then prime ministers Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi. Benefitting from the political focus, it involved works by 45 artists in the main large galleries (currently occupied by a stunningly dramatic and colourful exhibition of the American artist Kerry James Marshall). With works by seven artists, the Mukherjee exhibition is located on one of the academy’s upper floors. 

Mukherjee’s last UK show was some 30 years ago in Oxford, though she had an acclaimed exhibition titled Phenomenal Nature at New York’s Met Breuer gallery in 2019. Pakshi was among her “deities” shown at the 2022 Venice Biennale. 

With almost 100 works spanning a century, the RA exhibition flows on from a modern art show at London’s Barbican last year, which had a tighter-focussed 1975-98 time span with over 150 works by 30 artists, including Mukherjee and several others who are at the RA.

Sadly, there are on show only a few of Mukherjee’s spellbinding large textile figures like Pakshi for which she is most famous. This is partly because of financial constraints and partly because of what the RA describes as conservation issues with transporting older hemp works (though more have appeared at other exhibitions).  

Leela Mukherjee’s wooden sculptures© John Elliott

Mukherjee’s other bronze and ceramic sculptures along with water colours are also on show, accompanied by works by her mother Leela (left) and five other artists who were friends and who influenced each other’s styles. A very high proportion of the works have not been shown abroad before, including those by her mother.

The friends include husband and wife Gulammohammed (GM) and Nilima Sheikh. GM Sheikh had a memorable retrospective in Delhi early this year and both were included in the Barbican exhibition. Nilima has a softly colourful installation of hanging vertical scrolls (below) not previously seen outside India, Titled Songspace, it uses milk-based casein protein to bind the paint pigments. Other notable works include paintings by Jagdish Swaminathan and K.G. Subramanian.

Nalini Sheikh’s “Songspace” inspired by “tales of wandering mystics, exiled saints, and separate lovers”© John Elliott

The RA says that the main aim has been to show the close relationships and shared learning and support between the artists. This formed a “vibrant creative and intellectual network that influenced the development of modern and contemporary art in South Asia”.

As one of the oldest art schools in Europe, the RA highlights India’s notable art institutions—the Kala Bhavana (Institute of Fine Arts) in Santiniketan, founded in 1919 by the Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore, and the Faculty of Fine Arts at Maharaja Sayajirao University in Baroda, which are both noted for their artistic learning and styles. They comprise two of the sections of the exhibition, the third being Delhi. 

Notably not included, because they are not relevant to the Mukherjee story, are the Mumbai-based Progressives such as M.F. Husain and F.N. Souza who date from the 1940s and dominate the top end of the auction market.

Mrinalini Mukherjee’s “Ritu Raja” hemp and steel works

Mukherjee’s most memorable exhibition, Transfigurations, opened in Delhi’s National Gallery of Modern Art just a week before she died in 2015, aged 65. The gallery’s vast spaces were filled with her large and striking textile sculptures as well as metal and other works. I walked through that exhibition with the curator, Peter Nagy of Delhi’s Nature Morte Gallery, and wish I had written about it then.

Tarini Malik, now the Royal Academy’s chief curator for modern art, was also there and met Mukherjee before the artist died. That gave her the ambition to stage what is now on view at the RA, while acknowledging that the show should have been done years ago.

The RA covers the theme of Mukherjee and friends well, with neat division into the three Santiniketan, Baroda and Delhi parts. For many, it is a welcome opportunity to see so many works by respected names that have been loaned from normally hidden private collections. But unfortunately this is neither an exceptional display of a century of Indian modern art, nor an adequate display of Mukherjee’s drama.

Reviews in the UK media so far have been partly critical, reflecting the absence of enough of Mukherjee’s big textile work and the remoteness of the basic theme. The FT tactfully ends a generously positive full page-spread with “the contextual lacunas make this seem more a show, perhaps, for the initiated connoisseur”.

“Bird Trees and Mountain” by Jagdish Swaminathan

The Guardian is most belligerently negative. After saying Mukherjee’s “surreal spins on Indian folk and sacred art are powerfully fascinating”, it asks why the RA has tried “to suffocate her exhilarating works in an incoherent show that surrounds them with mediocre stuff by much less interesting artists”.

TheTimes reviewer says, “In many ways, it’s a beautiful show, aided by soft lighting and pale-pink walls. But I can’t help but wonder whether it would have been better off as a family affair.” The Observer thought the show was “overburdened with the fashionable purchases of private collectors”.

This is not the end of the story. Tarini Malik will be curating a follow-on exhibition next May at the Hepworth Gallery in Wakefield that describes Mukherjee as “one of the world’s most significant modernist sculptors”. The gallery website says this will be a major Mukherjee retrospective, but it seems that it will also include her mother Leela along with sculptures by other female artists. The critics hope that the focus will be clearer than many see it at the RA. 

Older Posts »

Categories