Posted by: John Elliott | June 18, 2009

Has the modern Indian art market found its bottom? – updated

(updated with information from the Financial Times dated June 20-21 on works in the Sotheby’s sale – inserted in italics below)

Judging by the relative success of sales at Sotheby’s, Christie’s and SaffronArt in the past ten days, it looks as if auctioneers and serious collectors of modern Indian art have found common ground at what some experts believe is the bottom of the market.

FNSouza 43x31 Death and the Maiden Sotheby's sold '08-09

Prices have collapsed overall by 40% or more over the past year or so, and some contemporary artists are down to 25% or less of their peak, but it seems that big collectors have decided it is time to start buying again now that auctioneers have severely curbed sellers’ expectations.

Sotheby’s auction on June 16 included 27 works that were originally bought in its New York auctions in March and September last year by an art fund – but “never paid for”, says the Financial Times quoting “trade sources”.

The FT adds that “Death and the Maiden” (above), a 43inx31in oil on canvas by F.N.Souza, which was estimated at £30,000-50,000 and sold for £46,500 ($76,800), had been secured in September last year by the art fund at $182,500 (then approx £102,000) – a fall of more than 50%.

Lot 59 Chowdhury

Sotheby’s reached a sale total of only £2.07m or $3.37m (including 20-25% buyers premium), but it was significant for the buoyant bidding, especially for a remarkable ink and pastel on paper (lacquered), Day Dreaming, by Jogen Chowdhury (above but pictured larger last week in my first auction post – click here) .

Painted in 1979, this went for a hammer price of around £310,000 (£373,250 including 20% premium) to a private US (presumed Indian) collector. That was an auction record for Chowdhury and was about three to four times the £80,00-£120,000 estimate.

The highest price of £335,000 (£403,250 with premium) – also three to four times estimates – went for Orange Head, a striking though rather fierce F.N.Souza (below) 86inx62in oil on canvas that was painted in 1963.

Souza Sotheby's London June '09 Lot 62
Orange Head by F.N.Souza

Bought by a private US (presumed Indian) collector, this work was also being re-offered after the art fund default. The price was an amazing 50% above the $400,000 (then approx £228,000) bid last September.

“This indicates that the focus among buyers is shifting back to selective artists in the modern Indian art market,” says Anders Petterson of ArtTactic, a London-based art analysis firm. Other works by Souza and M.F.Husain, India’s two leading veteran modern masters, also sold well including Husain’s untitled 1953 oil on canvas (below) that a US investor bought well above estimates at £109,250. Sotheby’s top ten lots are said to have been bought by established Indian and international collectors.

The Sotheby’s event followed a successful though smaller on-line auction by Mumbai-based SaffronArt last week, where more than half the 61 lots sold (out of 85 on offer) went above top estimates. The auction reaped Rs104m or $2.2m/£1.3m (including 10-15% buyers premium).

Earlier last week Christie’s set the trend with a good and lively London auction , with £2.43m (US$3.96m) sales – about 80% of the total 97 lots on offer and 90% of their total

Husain Sotheby's London June '09 Lot 53
untitled by M.F.Husain

estimated value. But both Christie’s and Sotheby’s sales were far below last year’s levels, when Christie’s London auction for example’s netted £5.4m . More than a third of the Sotheby’s works were miniature classical paintings from the 1700’s and 1800’s.

“”There has been a sea-change in perceptions and mind-set from even three months ago,” says Dinesh Vazirani, one of SaffronArt’s founders. “Serious collectors are seeing an opportunity and some old collectors from 2002-03 are buying again, but not investors who are scared to come in”.

SaffronArt’s buyers were mainly Indian, about 60% of them living in the country and 40% abroad. Its highest price of Rs14.9m or $317,000 (including premium) was paid for a 1984 untitled oil on canvas by V S Gaitonde.

SubodhGupta 66x90in oilcanvas sold $201k Rs94m Saffronart June 10 '09 Lot_21_edited
untitled by Subodh Gupta

Other sales included a 66inx90in oil on canvas untitled work by Subodh Gupta (right) which fetched Rs9.5m ($201,250). This was seen as a good price for current market conditions, but was far below Gupta’s record $1.2m paid in Hong Kong in May last year for a similar sized painting of a man pulling a luggage trolley.

Gupta is one of India’s leading contemporary artists. The steep fall shows how contemporary artists have been hit harder by collectors’ and investors’ loss of confidence than established modern artists such as Husain, Souza, Gaitonde and Ram Kumar, whose early works were the top sellers in the current auctions.

ArtTactic’s indicators (below) have significantly improved this year – more for modern than contemporary art – suggesting, Petterson says, that current price estimates have come down to attractive buyer levels, which “could be a sign that confidence is returning”.

IndiaAuctionIndicatorJun09_edited

As Vazirani points out, the current buoyant mood after India’s recent general election, with economic growth picking up and a slow-down in bad economic news, has helped boost buying – in addition to the fact that auctioneers have drastically cut their estimates in order to attract buyers.

That will be tested next at an auction in Mumbai on June 30 by Osian’s, India’s other leading auction house, of 58 modern and contemporary works. It includes Roadside with Temple, a vivid 4ftx6ft (approx) oil on canvas (below) by Atul Dodiya, a leading contemporary artist, estimated at Rs6.4m-8m ($133,330-$166,670).

“Sotheby’s tactic significantly to reduce the estimates (for some works between 60-70%), has paid off,” says Petterson. “The market seems to have found a temporary bottom, which has clearly reduced the price uncertainty……long-term buyers are seeing opportunities at current price levels”. However Petterson cautions that this should not be taken as a definite recovery in prices.

AtulDodiya RoadsideTemple 4ftx6ft approx $133-166k Osians June '09
Roadside with Temple by Atul Dodiya

3 Comments

Posted in Contemporary art, India, Indian contemporary art, Indian modern art | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | June 13, 2009

British media frenzy hounds greedy politicians into phoney constitutional crisis

Britain seems almost to enjoy revelling in bouts of national hysteria that appear cataclysmic for a time, but quickly fade away. Some 12 years ago, it was the death of Princess Diana that led to extraordinary expressions of public grief and dire criticism of the royal family.

Now, in a very different setting, Britain – where I have been for the past week – is wallowing in a daily drip-by-drip exposure by The Daily Telegraph of members of parliament’s expenses to pay for all sorts of homely things from house conversions, mortgages (sometimes for houses already sold), hi fi equipment, tuning a piano, and a baby’s cot, to gardeners, servicing a swimming pool, a girl friend/assistant’s “life improving” classes,  potted garden plants, Remembrance Day wreaths, and maintaining a moat (as in water round your castle) and so on.

Senior ministers have resigned from the government because of the revelations, and Britain seems to believe it is in the middle of a constitutional crisis. That is of course partly because support for the current Labour government is eroding fast, heightening the sense of crisis, and because the expenses revelations have hit all political parties.

In 1997, after Diana’s death, it was the monarchy that people said would have to change – and it has, but only a very little. Now people are talking about changing the way that parliament operates and is controlled – as if that would stop MPs claiming as much as possible on expenses!

Constitutional reform

There are even suggestions that Britain needs to tidy up its act with a written constitution instead of running its affairs on a semi-informal basis.

The prime minister – yes it’s still Gordon Brown (who charged for his brother to clean his private flat) – is himself suggesting constitutional reform, plus a more immediately practical “parliamentary standards authority”.  He has been followed by other party leaders, David Cameron (Conservatives) and Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats), who want to make things look different by introducing fixed-term periods for parliaments, removing a prime minister’s right to choose the timing of a general election. (The same idea is often raised in India which, post-colonially, follows the British parliamentary model).

As Ted Vallance, a history academic, points out in the (recently much duller) New Statesman, that idea has been around since the 17th century when efforts were made to rein in Charles the First. “The current debate on parliamentary reform reveals little more than a political class desperate to save its own skin,” Vallance writes, under the heading Burning down the House. “Bereft of genuinely innovative ideas, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg are ransacking the ideological storehouse of British history”.

The party leaders are themselves as guilty as ordinary MPs, and seemingly have no practical solution to offer on how to tighten the system. So they are heading for dramatic constitutional and parliamentary reforms which, while maybe worthwhile issues for long-term debate, are currently just useful time-consuming red herrings.

Cameron, desperate to make political capital ahead of a general election due next year, has called for “a massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power” (until, of course he gets hold of that power).

The MPs deserve some sympathy, or at least understanding,  brazenly corrupt though some certainly have been. They are only paid just under £70,000 a year (Rupees 52 lakhs or $115,000). This is, of course, enormously more than Indian MPs are paid, but it is not much after tax for a family, especially in London – and maybe with a second home in a possibly far-away constituency,

Jonathan Raban, a journalist, points out in the London Review of Books that MPs have been operating under the guidance and jurisdiction of officials in the House of Commons Fees Office. His article, headed Trouble at the Fees Office, explains that MPs have an “additional costs allowance” of up to £23,083 a year, which they can claim by presenting bills for various expenses:

“The safest way of getting it (the money) is to dump sheaves of bills at the Fees Office to prove that you’ve spent far more than the amount of the allowance and are therefore entitled to it in its entirety. Given the thicket of ambiguous rules and regulations set out in The Green Book: A Guide to Members’ Allowances, it’s not surprising that most MPs seem to have followed the example of Margaret Beckett (a senior Labour minister sacked in the last few days by Brown), who confessed: ‘I just grabbed together the relevant things and bunged them into the Fees Office and left it to them to sort it out.’ ”

Haven’t we all done that to claim expenses? It’s what I do every year when I send all sorts of bills to my tax accountant, leaving him to decide whether, for example, my recent air fare to London can be counted against tax.

British media at fault

The British media has behaved appallingly and is substantially responsible for the perceived crisis. The Telegraph, which received the details in a leaked package weeks ago, has spread out its revelations over more than a month instead of packaging them over a few days. This has built up a feeding frenzy with a public that loves to despise those in authority – and, which understandably, doesn’t think much of the often self-serving people who rule the country.

Other newspapers, and the tv channels, which usually don’t like picking up their rivals’ scoops have joined the frenzy, with scarcely anyone standing back and putting the issues in perspective, or explaining how the excesses have come about.

So, now I’m back in Delhi, let’s try to do that. The Telegraph disclosed on Wednesday that Shahid Malik, the communities minister, simultaneously charged in his applications for the costs of office space in both his constituency and London home – claiming “more than £6,500” (just under five lakhs of rupees).

As Indian MPs (and those who finance them) would testify, that’s not serious corruption by anyone’s standards. It certainly shows that the system of MPs’ allowances needs to be tightened – and some MPs may indeed deserve to be criminally charged for excesses.

But, as someone said on a British tv chat show recently, “the MPs have behaved more like idiots than scoundrels” – and that surely should not be regarded as a constitution-changing political crisis.

4 Comments

Posted in India politicians | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | June 10, 2009

Christie’s has a good India sale as art auctions adjust to tougher times

LONDON June 10 ’09:  Christie’s had a good and lively South Asian art auction in London today, with £2.43m (US$3.96m) sales – about 80% of the total 97 lots and 90% of their total estimated value, with buyers from New York, Dubai, Hong Kong and Singapore, as well as London.

A 35x75in M.F.Husain oil on canvas (below), painted 1960 in his Ragamala series, fetched the top hammer price of £330,000 (approx US$539,000 or Rs26m), though that was substantially less than the £400,000-£600,000 estimate. Other Husain’s went well – with the veteran artist watching happily from the back of the auction room.

2nd MFHusain 35x75in sold Christies £330,000 hammer 7814 lot 63

Further June 10 updates are in italics below

LONDON June 9 ’09:  An art auctioneer needs to persuade people to offer high grade pictures for sale, and then has to make the price and quality range attractive to pull in potential buyers.

That may sound a blindingly obvious statement, but it wasn’t true of modern and contemporary Indian art auctions a year ago, and certainly not two or three years ago. Hordes of buyers – mostly Indians living abroad (NRIs), and some at home – were then rushing, herd-like, chasing escalating prices to buy almost any available slice of fashionable Indian art that would enable them to display their wealth on the walls of their homes and offices. Profit-seeking sellers were happy, and prices rose to unsustainable levels, often with little regard for quality.

Now the international art market has slumped along with the economic crisis, and Christie’s and Sotheby’s are pitching low rather than high in their price ranges and forecasts for current London auctions – Christie’s June 10, and Sotheby’s next week – also Mumbai-based Saffronart with an on-line auction this week.

FNSouza 30x23in £30-60k Portrait of an ElderTheChurch Christies Lot 51They are all hoping that the best works will get very good prices at the top end of the market, as happened with contemporary Chinese art at recent auctions in Hong Kong, and that low prices will pull in new buyers.

“It’s very hard to get good works,” Hugo Weihe, Christie’s Asian art director, told me yesterday, though he was much more confident after the auction: “This shows there is a serious discriminating market and people who will buy,” he said

Some works come from unlikely sources. Two F.N.Souza paintings in Christie’s auction have come from owners who had absolutely no idea of their value. Portrait of an Elder (right), a 30inx23in oil on board, sold for £30,000 – the estimate was £30,000-£60,000 . One owner was alerted by a Souza being shown recently on Britain’s Antiques Roadshow tv programme.

Weihe is optimistic that new collectors will come in, along with buyers from India who are visiting Europe for the summer. Christies had Usha Mittal, wife of steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal, as the co-host for their private view last night, hoping the couple would entice big spenders from the top end of London’s Indian community. Last year Tina Ambani, wife of Anil Ambani, who runs one of India’s two Reliance groups, was the draw with works from her Harmony Art collection and charity

Sotheby’s is more restrained in its publicity, relying on exclusive lunches for its most promising buyers.

Lot 59 ChowdhuryZara Porter Hill, the India and S.E.Asia director, is convinced she has a major draw with Day Dreaming, (above) a magnificent largish (about 5ft x 6ft) Jogen Chowdhury ink and pastel on paper, lacquered, of a reclining female figure. Estimated at £80,000-120,000 (US$118,000-177,000), it is way below Chowdhury’s record (hammer) price of Rs14m (around $300,000) , which was four times estimates and was achieved in the hey days of mid-2006 for a 4ftx4ft oil on canvas.

All three auction houses are having to cope with dramatic falls in prices of 40% upwards over the past year. Results from a survey last month (May) by ArtTactic, a London-based art analysis firm, showed that average auction prices for modern Indian art have fallen by just over 30% since March last year, while contemporary art fell more than twice as much at just over 70%. 

SubodhGupta LeapofFaith8ft hi £70-100k $110-158k Christies Lot 69_editedBuyers are said to be looking for established modern artists with “proven historical value” such as V.S.Gaitonde, M.F.Husain, F.N.Souza and Akbar Padamsee. All these artists figure in the current auctions but, in the past year or so, only their best works have done well. Several Souzas and Husains for example did not sell at Christies in London last year..

ArtTactic’s overall  confidence indicator for Indian art has fallen 71% since May last year. Just over a third of respondents said modern Indian art would rebound in one to two years, and 50% estimated it would take two to five years. A higher proportion – 66% – thought contemporary art would take two to five years and almost a fifth said five to ten years..

Subodh Gupta, one of India’s leading contemporary artists, has a 8ft high pile of stainless steel pails at Christie’s (left) marked at £70,000-£100,000 and it sold for £82,000 ($134,000), but he got £600,000 (then $1.2m) for a large installation of stainless steel  kitchen pots and pans at the same auction last year. His paintings have dropped dramatically from approaching $1m to $200,000 at successive auctions
 
Both London auctioneers have cut the number of works from around 110-120 last June to around 90, and are putting conservative estimates on many works.

Prajakta Palav 67x61in £2,5-3,500 Sothebys Lot 85A third of the Christie’s works, which also include paintings from Pakistan and Sri Lanka, are estimated at up to just £5,000 ($8,000), and only 18 works are above £50,000.

Sotheby’s are in broadly similar ranges, and there are only 50 modern and contemporary works – including an untitled 67inx61in water-colour and acrylic on paper (left) by Prajakta Palav, a young Mumbai artist, in the low price range at £2,500-£3,500. The rest are Indian miniature paintings from the 1700’s and 1800’s.

Neither gallery is pushing works above £200,000 ($300,000), so there are none in the million-dollar-plus range seen last June when works by Gupta Tyeb Mehta, and Souza hit personal records from $1.2m to over $2m at the Christie’s London auction.

Lost Kingdom of Navin by Navin Rawanchaikul, a Thai-born Indian-Pakistani artist, depicting Indian art scene faces in a Bollywood billboard style – 6ftx11ft, £30,000-£40,000, at Christies

Lost Kingdom of Navin by Navin Rawanchaikul, a Thai-born Indian-Pakistani artist, depicting Indian art scene faces in a Bollywood billboard style – 6ftx11ft, £30,000-£40,000, at Christies

 

 

Leave a Comment

Posted in Contemporary art, India, Indian contemporary art, Indian modern art, Lakshmi Mittal | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | June 2, 2009

Nath inherits a muddy murky highways programme

India’s Ministry of Surface Transport is well known as a cash cow for the political party in power, and thus for the minister in charge if he is so minded, because of the massive contracts involved. But T.R.Baalu, who was the minister in the last United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, surprisingly did not manage to make a success of India’s 33,000km highway building programme, and did not ensure that a large number of contracts were placed and completed, during the five years that he was in charge.

Now Kamal Nath, a prominent Congress party politician who has been close to the Gandhi dynasty for 30 years, has been given the portfolio. Judging by his appearances on television the night he was appointed, and since, he seems happy with the job, even though its prestige and scope is far far less than the commerce and industry ministry that he ran for the past five years. My guess is that he will hold the post for a couple of years to get the ministry moving and do what he can with the full potential of the highways programme.

This is a story that shows how the muddle, contradictions, arguments and corruption that curiously generate much of India’s success, can also sometimes block progress. It demonstrates the need for strong leadership at the top, which was lacking in the last UPA government, but which prime minister Manmohan Singh now has the stature to provide.

NHDP_editedThe mostly-four lane national highways programme did well when it was initiated by the 1998-2004 Bharatiya Janata Party-led NDA coalition government. Contracts awarded while the BJP was in power led to some 6,000kms (3,750 miles) being completed by the end of 2005 at a cost of about $7bn, mostly on the Golden Quadrilateral that links India’s four biggest cities. There were of course massive delays because of slow land acquisition, corruption, bureaucratic lethargy, and extortion by gangsters and Naxalite (Maoist) rebels – but it was a success.

By the end of April this year however, the total completed had only gone up to just over 11,000kms, and awards of new contracts had slowed to such an extent that work was only started on 9,700kms compared with a five-year target of 16,000kms. The programme, which has attracted  few foreign construction companies because of the problems of operating in India, has now lost the momentum and drive of the BJP years, and urgently needs to be revived by Nath.

Baalu, who was in charge of shipping as well as highways, was one of two ministers from Tamil Nadu’s DMK political party that prime minister Manmohan Singh did not want to appoint again last week. Singh successfully excluded Baalu, but had to agree to let the other minister, A.Raja, go back to his old job at telecoms, which is another ministry favoured by bounty-seeking politicians. Both Baalu and Raja have been frequently accused of inefficiency and corruption.

Baalu was much more interested in dredging the controversial Sethusamudram Canal between Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka. This involves lucrative contracts and later there will be trans-shipping and port work which, it has been officially acknowledged, could benefit a trawling and fishing company in which two of his wives and sons are reported to have shares. Earlier Baalu was  a controversial environment minister and, in the mid-1990s, a well-connected junior minister in the petroleum ministry that handles high-value oil imports.

He regularly tried to influence and even dominate the detailed functioning of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), whose financially-sensitive responsibilities include drawing up initial lists of tenderers, and issuing partial and final completion certificates, as well as placing contracts. He changed the NHAI chairman five times in as many years when his wishes were not carried out – because, as a BJP spokesman euphemistically put it, of “his own whims and fancies”.

Private Sector BOP focus

There are several reasons for the poor performance and they are not all Baalu’s fault. Initially the Congress-led UPA government did not seem to want to promote the programme because it had been such a success for the previous BJP prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who took personal credit. Manmohan Singh ordered widespread six-laning of major four-lane highways, but there was little enthusiasm.

Much of the Vajpayee government’s success had been due to heavy government funding. This was needed to get the construction programme moving quickly on highways that would not yield profits, as well as on those that could be operated as private sector toll roads.

The Planning Commission however did not like this approach and switched the emphasis to private sector financing, stopping primary government funding and allowing only built-operate-and transfer (BOT) contracts. That virtually halted new contracts from the end of 2005.

A government Committee on Infrastructure was formed, serviced by the Commission, partly to keep a check on Baalu and his ministry, and partly to enforce the BOT system. This increased bureaucratic wrangling, and the committee took about two years to agree on a new model concession agreement (MCA) and prepare associated forms of contract and procedural documents.

This new approach did not take sufficient account of support financing that contractors need on highways with unprofitable tolls, and subsidies offered to encourage investments were inadequate.

In policy terms, the Commission had arguably taken highway construction out of the government’s “inclusive” approach to economic growth, where money is spent on uneconomic but socially desirable projects, and put it into the “exclusive” growth area where the private sector is expected to invest and reap profits.

The move was also disastrously timed because last year’s economic crisis pushed the cost of financing up to 15-16%. Contractors lost interest in raising funds, and few were willing to bid for the BOT contracts. When tenders were invited last year on 60 projects, no bids were received on 38 and, of the 22 that were tendered, only 12 led on to fully-financed contracts. The NHAI has now amended designs to reduce construction costs and has put the 38 out for fresh tenders along with 22 more.

Companies complained not only about inadequate support funding, but also that the NHAI was inflexible in its approach and handed over sites without adequate land clearance. The NHAI wanted to increase concessionary “viability funding”, but was blocked by the BOT-oriented infrastructure committee, though this is now being relaxed. (One source has told me that bureaucrats prefer government-run projects rather than BOT because it increases the opportunities for corruption both during construction, and on the collection of tolls).

Rival state projects

Complicating matters, state governments in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat. Uttar Pradesh and elsewhere have begun their own highway construction programmes, often without taking account of the national networks that they sometimes duplicate. State government ministers and bureaucrats see the potential for personal and party fund-raising, and are offering softer project terms than the NHAI’s. As a result, they were getting bids from contractors last year that were shunning the NHAI.

Nath now inherits a highways programme that is beginning to show signs of recovering from years of bureaucratic and inter-government wrangling, unhappy contractors and massive corruption, in addition to all the usual delays that  hit projects – plus the impact of the economic crisis.

He has said in the past few days that procedures should be eased  and, most importantly, that new sources of funding should be found. He has the political clout to make this happen and turn round the muddle left by Baalu – and he comes in an opportune time because economic and business confidence is recovering.

After the debacle of the special economic zones that Nath tried to introduce across the country in the last government, he now has a chance to prove himself on the highways.

1 Comment

Posted in India, India general election, India highways, India infrastructure, Manmohan Singh, Tamil Nadu | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | May 28, 2009

Some good names in India’s new cabinet

There are some new and interesting names in the appointments announced this evening for India’s new government after eleven days of haggling (for today’s earlier post click here).

They indicate a new constructive approach, driven by prime minister Manmohan Singh, especially on commerce and industry, education, the environment, and highways. (Click here for full list).

Four are specially notable:

ANAND SHARMA, minister for commerce and industry – on a big and surprise promotion, having previously been minister of state in external affairs and information, he is likely to take a less combative stance over WTO negotiations than his predecessor, Kamal Nath – and be a more straightforward, and maybe caring, economic liberaliser. He is also a Congress Party spokesman.

KAMAL NATH, minister for road transport and highways – previously commerce and industry minister, so this is definitely not a promotion, in fact it looks the reverse – but the sector needs tough action to revive stalled highway construction, and he has the political strength to do it.

KAPIL SIBAL, minister for human resource development – a good promotion and appointment (suggested on this blog) for this top lawyer who was previously minister for science and technology where he applied himself with the commitment that India’s dilapidated education system needs. Also a Congress spokesman.

JAIRAM RAMESH,  minister of state (with independent charge) for  environment and forests – previously in industry and power, and a top party adviser, he is likely to break the track record of many of his predecessors and bring in straightforward policies aimed primarily at streamlining environmental controls, instead of pursuing other agendas. He might be tough resisting international demands on climate change.

Others include:

MURLI DEORA, remains  minister for petroleum and natural gas;

AMBIKA SONI, a Gandhi family confidante becomes  minister for information and broadcasting;

A. RAJA remains minister for communications and information technology despite the prime minister’s wish not to give him any job at all;

SHASHI THAROOR, former top United Nations official who failed to get the secretary general’s job, is a minister of state in the ministry of external affairs;

SALMAN KHURSHEED, a minister in the 1980s and 1990s, and former Uttar Pradesh party chief, returns to the central government with double tasks as minister of state (with independent charge) for corporate affairs (he is a lawyer) and minorities;

PRAFUL PATEL remains minister of state (with independent charge) for civil aviation, despite the sector’s problems.

And Surprising – and Expected:

S.M.KRISHNA – a surprising choice as minister for external affairs, announced last weekend, he is an almost forgotten 78-year old former chief minister of Karnataka. He is credited with building up Bangalore, Karnataka’s state capital and IT centre, in the 1990s, but it is difficult to see him building much respect or access abroad – and, given his age, will not want to travel much.

MAMATA BANERJEE, leader of the West Bengal Trinamool Congress that routed the state’s communist-led Left Front in the election, was a shoe-in for railways minister last weekend. She showed her priorities are to defeat the communists in 2011 assembly polls when she broke with tradition earlier this week and took over her ministry from an office in Kolkata, not the Delhi headquarters. She said would “give little time to Delhi” and announced railway goodies for West Bengal.

4 Comments

Posted in India, India airlines, India environment, India general election, India infrastructure, India telecoms, Manmohan Singh, West Bengal | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | May 28, 2009

India’s Cabinet haggling shows it needs a House of Lords for ruffled egos

It’s rare to find something positive to say about Britain’s honours system but, as 59 of India’s new ministers  were being sworn in this morning, I realised that India’s new Council of Ministers is really being partly used as an inefficient form of such a system.

Think how many of the total of Council’s 79 ministers could have been left out of the list if they could have been sent instantly to the Lords (getting into India’s upper house, the Rajya Sabha is much more cumbersome and slow), or given a knighthood or some other gong, instead being awarded jobs to run the country.

The thought seemed even more valid as the country has waited all day (it is now 7pm) for an announcement on the ministers’ jobs – an announcement that has apparently been delayed hour after hour by persistent lobbying for top posts.

Farooq Abdullah, the veteran and sociable Kashmir politician, whose real ambition is to be India’s president or deputy president, could have become Lord Abdullah of Srinagar instead of minister of new and renewable energy.

Also, with fewer plaudits, Vilasrao Deshmukh, who was sacked as Congress’s chief minister in Maharashtra after last Novembers terrorist attacks could have had a knighthood instead of the ministry of heavy industries and public enterprises when he is not even an MP, leaving room for someone more interested.

Similarly accommodated could have been other politicians who Congress needs to consolidate its position in various states ahead of coming assembly elections, such as Maharashtra’s polls in September-October. India’s Bharat Ratna and Padma awards, made annually on Republic Day, do not have the same flexibility for stroking bruised egos.

Some of those left out will no doubt become governors of states, but that is usually seen, to use an English expression, as being “put out to grass”.

Consequently, the choice of ministers for what was originally billed as an efficient can-do government has been blurred and sabotaged by regional, caste, and other lobbying.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi, leader of the Congress Party and the United Progressive Alliance coalition, have spent eleven days trying to balance efficiency and youth on the one hand with prestige and greed (much of it dynasty-based) on the other – also bringing in, as I just mentioned, politicians who can use their prestige as central government ministers to strengthen Congress in the states at the expense of smaller regional parties.

Sadly however, central government efficiency does not seem to have won, though there are nearly 30 new faces, many young, which is good – and heavily dynastic, which is not.

The overall result does not look like being as focussed as had been expected – though a fair verdict will have to wait for the ministerial jobs to be announced, and for those appointed to show what they can do. Singh today described the cabinet as “energetic” with a mixture of youth and experience, but Gandhi admitted it had been “difficult” to finalise.

M. Karunanidhi, the 86-year old DMK leader and Tamil Nadu chief minister, has run rings round Singh and Gandhi as he has pushed the bounty-seeking interests of his party and dynasty-based entourage. He has only 18 MPs in the UPA, which totals 322 including supporters, so is not a crucial ally: yet other appointments have been held up for several days over the past week as the twists and turns of his warring family and other MPs were splashed across newspaper headlines and tv screens.

 Eventually a cabinet job has gone to A.Raja, previously a much-criticised telecoms minister, who Manmohan Singh had been determined to exclude. And M.K.Alagiri, one of Karunanidhi’s sons, is also in the cabinet even though he is a first-time MP.

Once that drama was over, Singh and Gandhi were swamped with intense lobbying from other states which were rightly jealous of the ridiculous time and attention given to Karunanidhi, and some regional party leaders who were jealous of some of the ministers announced last Friday.

Leave a Comment

Posted in dynasty, India, India general election, Manmohan Singh, Tamil Nadu | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | May 26, 2009

40,000 hits – thanks everyone

Hi folks – Riding the Elephant has just passed a total of 40,000 hits since I took it over from Fortune.com on August 1  last year – the current total is in the column on the right.

That’s roughly an average of 130 hits a day – and this month it’s 230 a day.

So many thanks – keep reading!
cheers
John Elliott

6 Comments

Posted in India | Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | May 25, 2009

India’s Bouncing Tycoons – Sunil Mittal back in Africa, Ranbaxy’s Singh loses to Japan

It is of course a coincidence, but the pace of corporate news in India is accelerating while the new government, whose election last week sparked a surge of corporate optimism and a stock market boom, dithers over which ministers to appoint to which jobs.

In the news this morning are two family businessmen, both market leaders, who have wanted to internationalise their businesses – Sunil Mittal, founder chairman of Bharti Airtel, and Malvinder Singh, who inherited his chairman’s and ceo’s position at the top of Ranbaxy Laboratories.

Sunil Mittal - a Forbes photo

Sunil Mittal - a Forbes photo

One now looks like succeeding, while the other appears to have failed

A year ago Mittal started audacious merger talks with MTN, a leading South Africa telecom company, but was ousted by Anil Ambani, whose Reliance-ADAG empire includes Reliance Communications. Ambani’s bid was then mischievously foiled by his estranged brother, Mukesh Ambani of RIL, who claimed prior rights to Reliance Communication’s shares in any deal.

Also a year ago Singh amazed India’s corporate world by selling control of Ranbaxy, which his family founded in 1961, to Daiichi Sankyo of Japan for around $2bn, while staying in charge as chairman and ceo.

Now the fortunes of these two men have been reversed:

–  Mittal, who already runs the world’s third biggest mobile phone business, is back today with a bid for a new deal that could eventually [italic inserts here and below added May 26 to indicate a merger is not the initial aim] give him control of MTN and the potential to become internationally significant.

–  Singh and his brother yesterday left the Ranbaxy board along with two other executives in what looks like a Daiichi coup.

Malvinder Singh - a BusinessWorld photo

Malvinder Singh - a BusinessWorld photo

Singh’s apparent ouster is a sad end for the family’s links with Ranbaxy, which has spearheaded the Indian pharmaceutical industry’s international growth. However, he has other interests – in Fortis healthcare and hospitals, and Religare financial services. He remained chairman, ceo and md when Daiichi bought control, but the share price has slipped by over 60% since then ands a $150m loss is forecast for the year.

More significantly, there are continuing US drug regulatory problems with over 30 Ranbaxy products, and it looks as if the Japanese, after watching from the sidelines, decided to signal to the US that Daiichi has taken charge.

Yesterday’s changes, with an Indian executive promoted to ceo and a Japanese Daiichi executive coming in as chairman, were billed as “amicable” – but Singh, who was to have held the jobs until 2013, did not appear at the announcement press conference.

It has never been clear how seriously, nor for how long, Singh wanted to straddle the two potentially ill-fitting roles of being a hired top executive in a Japanese group, and a healthcare and financial services entrepreneur, but clearly the mix didn’t gel.

Mittal is much more sure of what he wants to do. Having batted successfully for years against the powerful Ambani brothers, he has made Bharti the undisputed market leader, and the world’s third largest mobile services operator – it announced 100m customers ten days ago. He has said he now wants to expand globally, and clearly his Bharti Enterprises group is primarily eyeing the world’s next big telecoms growth area of Africa.

Like Singh, he is willing to sell some of the Bharti stake to achieve his ambitions, but he will not cede India-based control. Last year’s talks eventually foundered on MTN’s plan to base the merged group in South Africa, which Mittal would not accept, even though it looked as though he would have been in control.

Now he plans to acquire a 49% $4bn stake in MTN which, along with its shareholders, would get 36% in Bharti for $2.9bn. The initial result of this cash and shares deal would be what the companies call “a partnership….to create an emerging market powerhouse”, with revenues of over $200bn.  That would give Bharti “participatory and governance rights in MTN enabling it to fully consolidate the accounts of MTN”. A full merger, presumably Delhi-based,  would be a “broader strategic objective” for later.

A year ago Mittal seemed not to have ring-fenced his MTN talks well enough, nor fully mastered the intricacies of South Africa’s politics and focus on black economic empowerment. That left a gap that allowed Anil Ambani to burst in.

Mittal’s pride was hurt – he had just ended a year as president of the CII, a leading Indian business federation, and had won many top businessmen awards. He was also facing delays building up a retail and wholesale store business in India with Wal-Mart (which would have been opening its first wholesale outlet today in his home state of Punjab, were it not for widespread religious riots in the state).

Yesterday’s announcement cautioned that talks were at an early stage and might not lead to a deal, let alone a full merger, but Mittal has presumably organised his pieces better on the South African chessboard. 

He has secured exclusive talks until July 31 to seal a deal, which would have to clear various regulatory hurdles. These include India’s foreign direct investment (FDI) regulations that the last government controversially eased just before the general election, though both finance ministry and Reserve Bank of India officials later filed objections.

The MTN deal would be fine under those changes which, despite the officials’ objections,  look like being maintained by the new government under Pranab Mukherjee as finance minister.

An earlier version of this post is on www.ft.com/world/asiapacific/india

Leave a Comment

Posted in India, India FDI, India general election, India telecoms, Manmohan Singh, Mukesh Ambani, Reliance Communications, Religare, RIL, Sunil Mittal, West Bengal | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | May 22, 2009

Regional party claims cloud India’s new cabinet – updated

The prime minister and 19 ministers were sworn in Friday evening May 22. The first six cabinet appointments were announced Saturday afternoon – see [confirmed Saturday] inserts below. More names and positions are expected next Tuesday.

__________________________________________________________

It is ironic – and very revealing – that prime minister Manmohan Singh and Congress Party leader Sonia Gandhi have had more problems handling demands for lucrative ministerial posts from the DMK, a regional ally from Tamil Nadu, than in filling the most senior jobs in India’s new cabinet.

Following allegations of non-performance and corruption against some DMK ministers in the last government, the prime minister has been specially keen to exclude two of the party’s former ministers in charge of communications (including telecommunications) and surface transport (including highways), and also to get competent performers into such key infrastructure ministries.

M. Karunanidhi (right), with Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi, Pranab Mukherjee, A.J.Antony, at a UPA meeting this week - a Reuters pic

M. Karunanidhi (right), with Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi, Pranab Mukherjee, A.J.Antony, at a UPA meeting this week - a Reuters pic

That led to an impasse with the DMK, though it has been reported this evening that Congress is giving way on the two ministers, T.R.Baalu and A.Raja, and has offered to have them back in the cabinet, but not in infrastructure posts because of poor performance and controversies on highways and telecoms.

Earlier in the day, it looked as if a few posts such as communications, labour and possibly coal or mining might be left vacant (technically under the prime minister’s direct charge) for as long as a week or so in the hope of a compromise.

The shamelessness with which the DMK has publicly pursued its partially dynastic demands is both horrifying and comical. M. Karunanidhi, the 86-year old DMK leader and Tamil Nadu chief minister, initially demanded five cabinet berths with jobs for at least four of his family, including two of his sons and a daughter (by two of his wives).

Karunanidhi fasting over Sri Lanka last month - an AP pic

Karunanidhi fasting over Sri Lanka last month - an AP pic

Of the family candidates, grand-nephew Dayanidhi Maran, who was an effective telecommunications minister in the last government till Karunanidhi withdrew him in a family feud, is being offered the job again. But that is reported to have caused Karunanidhi problems with his more immediate family, and with the two others the government did initially not want.

One can almost sympathise with such a veteran politician for facing so much relentless pressure from his family near the end of his political career.

Meanwhile it looks as if Pranab Mukherjee will move from his old job as foreign minister and take over the finance ministry [confirmed Saturday] –  a job he first held 25 years ago. He has never been billed as a committed economic reformer, though he did try, unsuccessfully, to liberalise defence manufacturing when he was in charge of that ministry at the start of the last government. He is a respected and very able politician, which should help with the implementation of the government’s pro-poor and other policies.

That has left a gap at the external affairs ministry which, as I write, does not seem to have been filled. S.M.Krishna, a 77-year old former chief minister of Karnataka and governor of Maharashtra, is currently reported to be in the running for the job [confirmed Saturday].

 Kamal Nath is reported to have declined the portfolio, choosing apparently to stay as commerce and industry minister.
 
Another reported candidate for foreign affairs has been Kapil Sibal, formerly science minister, though it would be an unusually huge jump in status. He looks likely to be human resources minister (which I tipped him for a few days ago), in charge of sorting out India’s ailing education system.

Palianappan Chidambaram, is remaining home minister [confirmed Saturday] where he is in the middle of revamping the security services, and A.J.Antony is staying at defence [confirmed Saturday]. Antony is seen as a safe choice, even though he has allowed trade unions and others in the defence establishment to stall opening up manufacturing to the private sector.

But the most significant event in the past few days has been the way that Congress’s allies in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) have relentlessly pushed for lucrative rather than merely prestigious jobs – and that Congress has tried with only limited success to resist some of their demands.

Congress has 206 MPs in the 543-seat Lok Sabha (lower house) out of a total of 322 for the UPA and its supporters – but, even with such a high Congress figure, Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi have had to give way to the Trinamool Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) as well as handling the DMK’s demands.

Mamata Banerjee, leader of the Trinamool, who routed the communist-led Left Front in West Bengal, is being given the railways ministry [confirmed Saturday], even though she is not the most effective candidate.

The Maharashtra-based NCP’s Sharad Pawar is reported to be getting his old agriculture job back [confirmed Saturday], also Praful Patel at aviation – even though there has been criticism of the way those ministries have been run.

The DMK fought so long and hard for the jobs it wants that it seriously slowed down the selection of ministers.  That is why only 19 ministers have been sworn in tonight. There will another swearing-in session next Tuesday.

In India’s coalition governments, politics are always dominated by the ministers’ ability to raise money, as well as by ambitions  for power and prestige. Sadly, it does not look like being very different with the new government.

An earlier version of this post is on www.ft.com/world/asiapacific/india

FOR MORE POSTS ON INDIA’S GENERAL ELECTION TYPE General Election IN THE SEARCH BOX – OR CLICK General Election BELOW

2 Comments

Posted in dynasty, India, India defence industry, India economic reforms, India elections, India general election, Manmohan Singh, Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress, West Bengal | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by: John Elliott | May 20, 2009

Wall Street Journal wins on India’s 20-year approval cycle

Can Rahul Gandhi, heir apparent to be India’s prime minister, begin to make the sort of changes that people dreamed about when his father Rajiv Gandhi became prime minister in 1984?

The thought is prompted – odd though it may seem – by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on Monday becoming the first foreign newspaper to be published in India with full government permission, some 21 years after the Financial Times first approached the government for clearance.

When Rajiv Gandhi became prime minister in 1984, I wrote an article that began with a story of how the government had the year before placed a £50m order for goods wagon air brakes that had first been mooted 25 years earlier in 1959. The next paragraph talked about the power failing in Connaught Circus as a new Wimpy burger bar opened shop.

Now, more than two decades later, the story hasn’t changed. The WSJ has come in 20 years after foreign newspapers became interested in India. And in 2004, the government ordered $1.45bn British Hawk jet trainer aircraft that I had first written about as a potential order twenty years early. Power supplies still fail in Connaught Circus.

Rahul Gandhi of course isn’t becoming prime minister, as his father did in 1984. But the mood of expectancy that India’s new government will usher in a new era – epitomised by Gandhi’s emergence at or near the top – is much the same.

The key question is whether this government will be able to begin to break at least some of the grip wielded by vested interests, both Indian and foreign, that try to throttle advances until they have won whatever it is they are after.

The order for railway trucks’ gear had been blocked for over 20 years because rivals tried to defeat the preferred, and eventually successful, British contractor. The Hawk order was similarly delayed, at the end by the US, which had also been stalling the railway contract.

In both cases, bureaucrats and ministers were constantly “persuaded” by competitors not to make a final decision, officially by rivals producing endless technical and other adjustments but obviously also by other inducements.

The story is the same with foreign newspapers. In 1988, the Modi and Hinduja business groups approached the FT for a printing joint venture. Those approaches came to nothing, but the FT did become interested in India. It is however still waiting for permission, having been blocked by both foes and supposed friends since then  – click here for that story and here for a follow-up on foreign magazines, with Forbes magazine  launching its India edition this week.

The WSJ’s appearance is therefore a long overdue partial defeat of vested interests, led by The Times of India’s Bennett Colman business group that has tried to block foreign entrants, especially the FT, for two decades. (Bennett Colman even prints a thin supplement called Financial Times every week to secure the title.)

Owned since 2007 by Rupert Murdoch’s News International, the WSJ is being printed and distributed by The Indian Express group in Mumbai and Delhi. In line with government rules, it has set up an Indian company, Wall Street Journal India Publishing, which is wholly owned by Murdoch’s Dow Jones business that he bought ion 2007.

But the government has not entirely shaken off the media vested interests’ influence, and there are still rules that restrict circulation and profits.

Although 100% foreign (FDI) ownership has been allowed since January (before it was only 26%), the paper printed here must be a “facsimile” edition. That is an intentional use of a word from a slightly outdated technology to establish that it has to be a precise copy of an edition published abroad with no change in advertising or editorial. This makes it far less commercially viable than it might be because the paper cannot have India-specific content.

Dow Jones received permission to bring in either its US or Asia edition and decided, after much agonizing, on The Wall Street Journal Asia from Hong Kong – but today’s edition (the first I have been able to buy this week from my local newsstand) has only one India story tucked in at the bottom of an inside page, though there are others on Pakistan and Sri Lanka

Pricing is difficult, unless the paper is to be a loss leader, which Murdoch seems to tolerate because of his love of the print media – his London Times loses £1m a day.

The figures in India however will not be very big – Murdoch’s government-approved investment is just Rs21m ($450,000). The paper is priced at Rs25 (roughly 50c or 30p), seven to ten times that of India’s main business dailies such as The Economic Times, Mint (produced for two years with Wall Street Journal syndicated content) and Business Standard, so it will probably have little appeal below senior management.  

The restrictions show that the Indian media’s vested interests still have a grip on government policy, and thus on the competitiveness of foreign rivals, though the extent of their luddite influence is waning.

The question now is whether the new government can begin to change India in the way that optimists hope.

As I suggested last Sunday,  a starting point would be to ensure that bounty-chasing regional parties such as the DMK and NCP do not get lucrative posts such as telecoms, highways and aviation, which urgently need the firm hand of a minister genuinely interested in progress and efficiency. One could add environment, power, petroleum, and others to that list in addition to external affairs, home, finance and defence.

Vested interests – ie rival companies – will of course always have a big influence, and politicians of all shades of honesty and dishonesty and personal greed will always be on the take,

But India needs a government that cuts into what I have typified here as a 20-year long hold on decision-making!

1 Comment

Posted in India, India media | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories